2003Journal of the Korean Society of Civil EngineersRequires access

A Study on the Design Parameters of Subgrade Soil by Different Compaction Methods

Seung-Mok Park, Kwan-Ho Lee

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

It has been widely used the proctor compaction and laboratory tests for evaluation of its design properties and compaction characteristics for subgrade soils. However, the compaction roller with static load has been used for compaction of subgrade soils. The purpose of this research was to evaluate the design properties of subgrade soil, which was compacted by Servopac gyratory compactor to simulate the field compaction. Field compaction data and couple of properties were collected from road construction site. Disturbed soils was used for laboratory compaction and gyratory compaction. For the comparison, block sampling was conducted on the subgrade after finishing the final compaction. Uniaxial compression strengths for field specimen from block sampling and specimen by Servopac gyratory compactor are almost same. But, those of specimen by D-method and A-method using proctor showed a little big difference for those of field specimen. This means that evaluation for design properties for subgrade soil by proctor compaction is not proper and gives the higher values than that of field compaction-soil. Judging from the un confined creep test, the trend of settlement is very closed between field compaction soil and gyratory compaction soil.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

It has been widely used the proctor compaction and laboratory tests for evaluation of its design properties and compaction characteristics for subgrade soils. However, the compaction roller with static load has been used for compaction of subgrade soils. The purpose of this research was to evaluate the design properties of subgrade soil, which was compacted by Servopac gyratory compactor to simulate the field compaction. Field compaction data and couple of properties were collected from road construction site. Disturbed soils was used for laboratory compaction and gyratory compaction. For the comparison, block sampling was conducted on the subgrade after finishing the final compaction. Uniaxial compression strengths for field specimen from block sampling and specimen by Servopac gyratory compactor are almost same. But, those of specimen by D-method and A-method using proctor showed a little big difference for those of field specimen. This means that evaluation for design properties for subgrade soil by proctor compaction is not proper and gives the higher values than that of field compaction-soil. Judging from the un confined creep test, the trend of settlement is very closed between field compaction soil and gyratory compaction soil.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

It has been widely used the proctor compaction and laboratory tests for evaluation of its design properties and compaction characteristics for subgrade soils. However, the compaction roller with static load has been used for compaction of subgrade soils. The purpose of this research was to evaluate the design properties of subgrade soil, which was compacted by Servopac gyratory compactor to simulate the field compaction. Field compaction data and couple of properties were collected from road construction site. Disturbed soils was used for laboratory compaction and gyratory compaction. For the comparison, block sampling was conducted on the subgrade after finishing the final compaction. Uniaxial compression strengths for field specimen from block sampling and specimen by Servopac gyratory compactor are almost same. But, those of specimen by D-method and A-method using proctor showed a little big difference for those of field specimen. This means that evaluation for design properties for subgrade soil by proctor compaction is not proper and gives the higher values than that of field compaction-soil. Judging from the un confined creep test, the trend of settlement is very closed between field compaction soil and gyratory compaction soil.

Key concepts: Compaction, Subgrade, Geotechnical engineering, Soil water, Soil compaction, Proctor compaction test, Geology, Settlement (finance)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Study on the Design Parameters of Subgrade Soil by Different Compaction Methods — Research Paper | ScholarLens