Two Instruments For Assessing Design Outcomes Of Capstone Projects
Vikas K. Jain, Durward K. Sobek
Abstract
Open-access reader
Vikas K. Jain, Durward K. Sobek
Abstract
Open-access reader
A "good" design process is perhaps best defined by its output-good design processes produce good design outcomes.As part of an NSF-funded research effort to better understand student design processes, we developed two assessment instruments to measure the "goodness" of a design outcome.This paper describes the development and validation of the two instruments, presents the instruments and their implementation, and reports validation statistics on the initial data collected.
OpenAlex reports 50 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A "good" design process is perhaps best defined by its output-good design processes produce good design outcomes.As part of an NSF-funded research effort to better understand student design processes, we developed two assessment instruments to measure the "goodness" of a design outcome.This paper describes the development and validation of the two instruments, presents the instruments and their implementation, and reports validation statistics on the initial data collected.
Key concepts: Capstone, Session (web analytics), Engineering design process, Process (computing), Computer science, Quality (philosophy), Design process, Engineering management