20062006 ITE Annual Meeting and Exhibit Compendium of Technical PapersInstitute of Transportation Engineers (ITE)Requires access

Value Pricing as a Congestion Management Tool

Mark Burris

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

This paper examines the basic idea behind the use of value pricing as a congestion management tool and then the paper examines several operational value pricing projects. Value pricing offers the ability to price travel in such a manner that travel demand remains below the point at which significant congestion occurs. This makes value pricing is particularly effective at combating congestion due to its relative immunity to the effect of triple convergence. Value pricing can take many forms, but three of the most common are cordon (or area) pricing, variable priced facilities, and High Occupancy/Toll (HOT) lanes. This paper takes a brief look at examples of each of these value pricing styles including those used in London, Stockholm, Lee County, Southern California, Houston, and Minnesota. Based on the results from these projects, it is clear that value pricing can offer congestion relief, but can also be politically difficult to implement. Therefore, it is likely that there will continue to be slow progress in implementing value pricing, with a focus on less controversial projects including HOT and managed lanes.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper examines the basic idea behind the use of value pricing as a congestion management tool and then the paper examines several operational value pricing projects. Value pricing offers the ability to price travel in such a manner that travel demand remains below the point at which significant congestion occurs. This makes value pricing is particularly effective at combating congestion due to its relative immunity to the effect of triple convergence. Value pricing can take many forms, but three of the most common are cordon (or area) pricing, variable priced facilities, and High Occupancy/Toll (HOT) lanes. This paper takes a brief look at examples of each of these value pricing styles including those used in London, Stockholm, Lee County, Southern California, Houston, and Minnesota. Based on the results from these projects, it is clear that value pricing can offer congestion relief, but can also be politically difficult to implement. Therefore, it is likely that there will continue to be slow progress in implementing value pricing, with a focus on less controversial projects including HOT and managed lanes.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper examines the basic idea behind the use of value pricing as a congestion management tool and then the paper examines several operational value pricing projects. Value pricing offers the ability to price travel in such a manner that travel demand remains below the point at which significant congestion occurs. This makes value pricing is particularly effective at combating congestion due to its relative immunity to the effect of triple convergence. Value pricing can take many forms, but three of the most common are cordon (or area) pricing, variable priced facilities, and High Occupancy/Toll (HOT) lanes. This paper takes a brief look at examples of each of these value pricing styles including those used in London, Stockholm, Lee County, Southern California, Houston, and Minnesota. Based on the results from these projects, it is clear that value pricing can offer congestion relief, but can also be politically difficult to implement. Therefore, it is likely that there will continue to be slow progress in implementing value pricing, with a focus on less controversial projects including HOT and managed lanes.

Key concepts: Toll, Congestion pricing, Singapore Area Licensing Scheme, Value (mathematics), Dynamic pricing, Variable pricing, Economics, Transport economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Value Pricing as a Congestion Management Tool — Research Paper | ScholarLens