2009Apress eBooksRequires access

Transparent Data Encryption

Michael Coles, Rodney Landrum

Open publisher page 33 citations

Abstract

Up to this point, I’ve focused on cell-level encryption, which represents a significant portion of SQL Server’s encryption functionality. Cell-level encryption can be an extremely useful tool for targeted data encryption, but it does have some drawbacks. For one thing, a proper strategy involving cell-level encryption requires careful planning to balance the needs of security and performance. Cell-level encryption can be difficult, or impossible in some cases, to implement when you already have a database in production. The cost of refactoring a complex database (and its dependent applications) can be a significant deterrent to implementing cell-level encryption. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Up to this point, I’ve focused on cell-level encryption, which represents a significant portion of SQL Server’s encryption functionality. Cell-level encryption can be an extremely useful tool for targeted data encryption, but it does have some drawbacks. For one thing, a proper strategy involving cell-level encryption requires careful planning to balance the needs of security and performance. Cell-level encryption can be difficult, or impossible in some cases, to implement when you already have a database in production. The cost of refactoring a complex database (and its dependent applications) can be a significant deterrent to implementing cell-level encryption. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 33 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Up to this point, I’ve focused on cell-level encryption, which represents a significant portion of SQL Server’s encryption functionality. Cell-level encryption can be an extremely useful tool for targeted data encryption, but it does have some drawbacks. For one thing, a proper strategy involving cell-level encryption requires careful planning to balance the needs of security and performance. Cell-level encryption can be difficult, or impossible in some cases, to implement when you already have a database in production. The cost of refactoring a complex database (and its dependent applications) can be a significant deterrent to implementing cell-level encryption. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Key concepts: Encryption, 56-bit encryption, 40-bit encryption, Computer science, Client-side encryption, Probabilistic encryption, Multiple encryption, On-the-fly encryption

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Transparent Data Encryption — Research Paper | ScholarLens