2007Unpublished venueRequires access

Comparison of Profile Index and International Roughness Index for Pavement Smoothness Incentive Specifications

W James Wilde, Bernard Igbafen Izevbekhai, M. H. Krause

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) is currently evaluating a change from the Profile Index (PI) to the International Roughness Index (IRI) for smoothness specifications for portland cement concrete (PCC) pavements. This change has already occurred for bituminous pavements in Minnesota. The Mn/DOT Office of Materials, as well as paving contractors in Minnesota, is naturally concerned with the effects that this change will have on the quality of pavement surfaces and on the incentives paid for new pavement smoothness. The Office of Materials has funded an “implementation ” project to compare the two smoothness statistics and to provide recommendations for implementing the new specification. This paper contains several analyses and comparisons of the relative effects of pavement features in design and construction with regard to the results of pavement surface smoothness and incentive computations. It also contains an analysis of segment length for incentive/disincentive calculations on PCC pavement projects. The information presented in this paper can be useful to those considering

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) is currently evaluating a change from the Profile Index (PI) to the International Roughness Index (IRI) for smoothness specifications for portland cement concrete (PCC) pavements. This change has already occurred for bituminous pavements in Minnesota. The Mn/DOT Office of Materials, as well as paving contractors in Minnesota, is naturally concerned with the effects that this change will have on the quality of pavement surfaces and on the incentives paid for new pavement smoothness. The Office of Materials has funded an “implementation ” project to compare the two smoothness statistics and to provide recommendations for implementing the new specification. This paper contains several analyses and comparisons of the relative effects of pavement features in design and construction with regard to the results of pavement surface smoothness and incentive computations. It also contains an analysis of segment length for incentive/disincentive calculations on PCC pavement projects. The information presented in this paper can be useful to those considering

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) is currently evaluating a change from the Profile Index (PI) to the International Roughness Index (IRI) for smoothness specifications for portland cement concrete (PCC) pavements. This change has already occurred for bituminous pavements in Minnesota. The Mn/DOT Office of Materials, as well as paving contractors in Minnesota, is naturally concerned with the effects that this change will have on the quality of pavement surfaces and on the incentives paid for new pavement smoothness. The Office of Materials has funded an “implementation ” project to compare the two smoothness statistics and to provide recommendations for implementing the new specification. This paper contains several analyses and comparisons of the relative effects of pavement features in design and construction with regard to the results of pavement surface smoothness and incentive computations. It also contains an analysis of segment length for incentive/disincentive calculations on PCC pavement projects. The information presented in this paper can be useful to those considering

Key concepts: International Roughness Index, Smoothness, Incentive, Index (typography), Ride quality, Surface finish, Engineering, Civil engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of Profile Index and International Roughness Index for Pavement Smoothness Incentive Specifications — Research Paper | ScholarLens