2011•American Water Works AssociationRequires access

Temporal variation of NOM and its effects on membrane treatment

Bethany M. Brinkman, Raymond M. Hozalski

Open publisher page 10 citations

Abstract

Near real‐time monitoring of natural organic matter (NOM) concentration and composition in the upper Mississippi River was performed for 11 months. The monitoring found distinct seasonal trends in dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentration and ultraviolet light absorbance at 254 nm as well as short‐term (i.e., hours to days) increases that correlated with increases in river discharge during storms and snowmelt. The permeability (i.e., transmembrane pressure‐normalized flux) of hydrophilic ultrafiltration membranes was negatively correlated with river flow (p < 0.01) and raw water specific ultraviolet absorbance (p < 0.01) but not with raw water DOC concentration (p = 0.865). Overall, the potential benefits derived from the increased data provided by an on‐line monitoring system should outweigh the maintenance requirements for such instrumentation. Such data potentially could be used for real‐time control of chemical dosing rates as well as membrane backwash and cleaning schedules.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Near real‐time monitoring of natural organic matter (NOM) concentration and composition in the upper Mississippi River was performed for 11 months. The monitoring found distinct seasonal trends in dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentration and ultraviolet light absorbance at 254 nm as well as short‐term (i.e., hours to days) increases that correlated with increases in river discharge during storms and snowmelt. The permeability (i.e., transmembrane pressure‐normalized flux) of hydrophilic ultrafiltration membranes was negatively correlated with river flow (p < 0.01) and raw water specific ultraviolet absorbance (p < 0.01) but not with raw water DOC concentration (p = 0.865). Overall, the potential benefits derived from the increased data provided by an on‐line monitoring system should outweigh the maintenance requirements for such instrumentation. Such data potentially could be used for real‐time control of chemical dosing rates as well as membrane backwash and cleaning schedules.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Near real‐time monitoring of natural organic matter (NOM) concentration and composition in the upper Mississippi River was performed for 11 months. The monitoring found distinct seasonal trends in dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentration and ultraviolet light absorbance at 254 nm as well as short‐term (i.e., hours to days) increases that correlated with increases in river discharge during storms and snowmelt. The permeability (i.e., transmembrane pressure‐normalized flux) of hydrophilic ultrafiltration membranes was negatively correlated with river flow (p < 0.01) and raw water specific ultraviolet absorbance (p < 0.01) but not with raw water DOC concentration (p = 0.865). Overall, the potential benefits derived from the increased data provided by an on‐line monitoring system should outweigh the maintenance requirements for such instrumentation. Such data potentially could be used for real‐time control of chemical dosing rates as well as membrane backwash and cleaning schedules.

Key concepts: Dissolved organic carbon, Absorbance, Ultrafiltration (renal), Natural organic matter, Environmental science, Environmental chemistry, Snowmelt, Chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Temporal variation of NOM and its effects on membrane treatment — Research Paper | ScholarLens