2007Unpublished venueRequires access

Bioefficacy of a probiotic feed additive in broiler diets.

J. Sánchez, E. Esteve‐García, J. M. McNab, Daniel Díaz, M. I. Gracia

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Three experiments were conducted to evaluate the effects of a probiotic supplement on the performance of broiler chickens. In each experiment, two treatments were applied during both the starter (1-21d) and the grower (22-42d) phases: a basal diet, and the basal diet supplemented with 10 CFU/kg Enterococcus faecium CECT 4515. Diets were presented as mash (Experiments I and II) or pellets (Experiment III) following local custom, and were based on wheat, barley, maize and soybean meal. 18, 12 and 16 replicates of 22, 60 and 40 Ross-308 birds per treatment were used in Experiments I, II and III, respectively. In all the Experiments, probiotic supplementation increased feed intake at 21 d (53.3 vs 55.3 g/d; 46.4 vs 47.9 g/d; 41.0 vs 46.8 g/d; P<0.050). In addition, probiotic supplementation also increased growth in Experiments I and III (36.3 vs 37.8 g/d; 26.6 vs 30.1 g/d; P<0.050), and in Experiment II (28.0 vs 28.7 g/d; P<0.100). Over the whole period, significant differences were also observed for growth and feed intake in Experiment III, but only for feed intake in Experiment I, and were absent in Experiment II. These results suggest that the probiotic tested improves the performance of birds especially between 1 and 21 d.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Three experiments were conducted to evaluate the effects of a probiotic supplement on the performance of broiler chickens. In each experiment, two treatments were applied during both the starter (1-21d) and the grower (22-42d) phases: a basal diet, and the basal diet supplemented with 10 CFU/kg Enterococcus faecium CECT 4515. Diets were presented as mash (Experiments I and II) or pellets (Experiment III) following local custom, and were based on wheat, barley, maize and soybean meal. 18, 12 and 16 replicates of 22, 60 and 40 Ross-308 birds per treatment were used in Experiments I, II and III, respectively. In all the Experiments, probiotic supplementation increased feed intake at 21 d (53.3 vs 55.3 g/d; 46.4 vs 47.9 g/d; 41.0 vs 46.8 g/d; P<0.050). In addition, probiotic supplementation also increased growth in Experiments I and III (36.3 vs 37.8 g/d; 26.6 vs 30.1 g/d; P<0.050), and in Experiment II (28.0 vs 28.7 g/d; P<0.100). Over the whole period, significant differences were also observed for growth and feed intake in Experiment III, but only for feed intake in Experiment I, and were absent in Experiment II. These results suggest that the probiotic tested improves the performance of birds especially between 1 and 21 d.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Three experiments were conducted to evaluate the effects of a probiotic supplement on the performance of broiler chickens. In each experiment, two treatments were applied during both the starter (1-21d) and the grower (22-42d) phases: a basal diet, and the basal diet supplemented with 10 CFU/kg Enterococcus faecium CECT 4515. Diets were presented as mash (Experiments I and II) or pellets (Experiment III) following local custom, and were based on wheat, barley, maize and soybean meal. 18, 12 and 16 replicates of 22, 60 and 40 Ross-308 birds per treatment were used in Experiments I, II and III, respectively. In all the Experiments, probiotic supplementation increased feed intake at 21 d (53.3 vs 55.3 g/d; 46.4 vs 47.9 g/d; 41.0 vs 46.8 g/d; P<0.050). In addition, probiotic supplementation also increased growth in Experiments I and III (36.3 vs 37.8 g/d; 26.6 vs 30.1 g/d; P<0.050), and in Experiment II (28.0 vs 28.7 g/d; P<0.100). Over the whole period, significant differences were also observed for growth and feed intake in Experiment III, but only for feed intake in Experiment I, and were absent in Experiment II. These results suggest that the probiotic tested improves the performance of birds especially between 1 and 21 d.

Key concepts: Starter, Probiotic, Broiler, Enterococcus faecium, Meal, Animal science, Food science, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Bioefficacy of a probiotic feed additive in broiler diets. — Research Paper | ScholarLens