2009Journal of AgrometeorologyOpen access

Irrigation -yield response factor of winter wheat for different growth phases

M. Hossain Ali

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

The yield response factor of semi-dwarf winter wheat was determined from field experimental data conducted during three consecutive years (2002-03 to 2004-05). The yield response factor (ky) varies depending on growth phases and also among seasons. On an average, the ky for early, vegetative, booting-heading, and flowering-soft dough stages were 0.27, 0.21, 0.25, and 0.17, respectively. According to the value of yield response factor, the most sensitive growth stages were in the order: CRI> booting-heading>maximum tillering> flowering-soft dough. For the alternate deficit strategies (deficit at tillering + flowering –soft dough; deficit at CRI + booting-heading stages), the ky values were 0.77 and 0.61, respectively. For the whole growing period, the ky values were 1.58, 0.43, 2.29, and 0.61 for deficit at early, vegetative, booting-heading, and flowering-soft dough stages, respectively. The sensitivity index (lembda i, of Jensen model) for early, vegetative, booting-heading, and flowering-soft dough phases were 0.35, 0.22, 0.31, and 0.14, respectively. A more sensitive growth stage has a higher value of lambda i, and therefore water supply is more important at early and booting-heading phases.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The yield response factor of semi-dwarf winter wheat was determined from field experimental data conducted during three consecutive years (2002-03 to 2004-05). The yield response factor (ky) varies depending on growth phases and also among seasons. On an average, the ky for early, vegetative, booting-heading, and flowering-soft dough stages were 0.27, 0.21, 0.25, and 0.17, respectively. According to the value of yield response factor, the most sensitive growth stages were in the order: CRI> booting-heading>maximum tillering> flowering-soft dough. For the alternate deficit strategies (deficit at tillering + flowering –soft dough; deficit at CRI + booting-heading stages), the ky values were 0.77 and 0.61, respectively. For the whole growing period, the ky values were 1.58, 0.43, 2.29, and 0.61 for deficit at early, vegetative, booting-heading, and flowering-soft dough stages, respectively. The sensitivity index (lembda i, of Jensen model) for early, vegetative, booting-heading, and flowering-soft dough phases were 0.35, 0.22, 0.31, and 0.14, respectively. A more sensitive growth stage has a higher value of lambda i, and therefore water supply is more important at early and booting-heading phases.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The yield response factor of semi-dwarf winter wheat was determined from field experimental data conducted during three consecutive years (2002-03 to 2004-05). The yield response factor (ky) varies depending on growth phases and also among seasons. On an average, the ky for early, vegetative, booting-heading, and flowering-soft dough stages were 0.27, 0.21, 0.25, and 0.17, respectively. According to the value of yield response factor, the most sensitive growth stages were in the order: CRI> booting-heading>maximum tillering> flowering-soft dough. For the alternate deficit strategies (deficit at tillering + flowering –soft dough; deficit at CRI + booting-heading stages), the ky values were 0.77 and 0.61, respectively. For the whole growing period, the ky values were 1.58, 0.43, 2.29, and 0.61 for deficit at early, vegetative, booting-heading, and flowering-soft dough stages, respectively. The sensitivity index (lembda i, of Jensen model) for early, vegetative, booting-heading, and flowering-soft dough phases were 0.35, 0.22, 0.31, and 0.14, respectively. A more sensitive growth stage has a higher value of lambda i, and therefore water supply is more important at early and booting-heading phases.

Key concepts: Agronomy, Irrigation, Yield (engineering), Winter wheat, Environmental science, Crop yield, Response factor, Mathematics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Irrigation -yield response factor of winter wheat for different growth phases — Research Paper | ScholarLens