2010•Cambridge University Press eBooksRequires access

Generalisations of Gödel's universe of constructible sets

Sy‐David Friedman

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Gödel’s universe L of constructible sets has many attractive features. It has a definable wellordering (a strong form of AC) and satisfies not only the generalised continuum hypothesis (GCH), but also strong combinatorial principles such as Jensen’s ♦, 2 and Morass (see [6]). In this sense, the theory ZFC + V = L is mathematically strong. However many interesting set-theoretic statements imply the consistency of ZFC, whereas V = L does not. In this sense, the theory ZFC + V = L is consistency weak. For this reason it is common in set theory to assume at least the existence of inner models of V which contain large cardinals (inaccessible, measurable, strong, Woodin, superstrong and beyond). ZFC + large cardinals is consis-tency strong, in the sense that for an abundance of set-theoretic statements ϕ (not known to be inconsistent), we have Con(ZFC + LC) → Con(ZFC + ϕ) for some large cardinal axiom LC. And in many cases, we have

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Gödel’s universe L of constructible sets has many attractive features. It has a definable wellordering (a strong form of AC) and satisfies not only the generalised continuum hypothesis (GCH), but also strong combinatorial principles such as Jensen’s ♦, 2 and Morass (see [6]). In this sense, the theory ZFC + V = L is mathematically strong. However many interesting set-theoretic statements imply the consistency of ZFC, whereas V = L does not. In this sense, the theory ZFC + V = L is consistency weak. For this reason it is common in set theory to assume at least the existence of inner models of V which contain large cardinals (inaccessible, measurable, strong, Woodin, superstrong and beyond). ZFC + large cardinals is consis-tency strong, in the sense that for an abundance of set-theoretic statements ϕ (not known to be inconsistent), we have Con(ZFC + LC) → Con(ZFC + ϕ) for some large cardinal axiom LC. And in many cases, we have

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Gödel’s universe L of constructible sets has many attractive features. It has a definable wellordering (a strong form of AC) and satisfies not only the generalised continuum hypothesis (GCH), but also strong combinatorial principles such as Jensen’s ♦, 2 and Morass (see [6]). In this sense, the theory ZFC + V = L is mathematically strong. However many interesting set-theoretic statements imply the consistency of ZFC, whereas V = L does not. In this sense, the theory ZFC + V = L is consistency weak. For this reason it is common in set theory to assume at least the existence of inner models of V which contain large cardinals (inaccessible, measurable, strong, Woodin, superstrong and beyond). ZFC + large cardinals is consis-tency strong, in the sense that for an abundance of set-theoretic statements ϕ (not known to be inconsistent), we have Con(ZFC + LC) → Con(ZFC + ϕ) for some large cardinal axiom LC. And in many cases, we have

Key concepts: Universe, Physics, Mathematics, Astronomy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Generalisations of Gödel's universe of constructible sets — Research Paper | ScholarLens