1992•PubMedRequires access

The diagnosis and management of dystocia of the shoulder.

John C. Morrison, Julia Sanders, Everett F. Magann, Winfred L. Wiser

Open publisher page 46 citations

Abstract

Dystocia of the shoulder is an unpredictable obstetric emergency that may result in injury to the mother or fetus. In an effort to reduce such risks, attempts have been made to identify patients having a fetus who may subsequently develop shoulder dystocia. The literature, however, clearly reflects that even the combination of prenatal historic facts, estimated fetal weight and sequence of intrapartum events is ineffective in prospectively identifying infants whose births are complicated by shoulder dystocia. During a ten year period at the University of Mississippi Medical Center, the incidence of macrosomia, shoulder dystocia and subsequent brachial plexus injury was reviewed. The majority of instances (89 percent) of shoulder dystocia occurred in patients weighing less than 8 pounds 13 ounces at birth. In the current retrospective review, only 11 percent of the women had risk factors for macrosomia or shoulder dystocia and among these, none were identified prospectively. Additionally, 91 percent of patients with brachial plexus injury recovered with no sequelae. One instance of brachial plexus injury occurred at the time of cesarean section. These data reveal that macrosomia and subsequent shoulder dystocia cannot be predicted. Therefore, it is not feasible to prevent brachial plexus injury prospectively by prophylactic cesarean section. Great clinical acumen and technical expertise by the obstetrician using a variety of methods may be useful in avoiding, as much as possible, injury to the mother and fetus when shoulder dystocia does occur.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Dystocia of the shoulder is an unpredictable obstetric emergency that may result in injury to the mother or fetus. In an effort to reduce such risks, attempts have been made to identify patients having a fetus who may subsequently develop shoulder dystocia. The literature, however, clearly reflects that even the combination of prenatal historic facts, estimated fetal weight and sequence of intrapartum events is ineffective in prospectively identifying infants whose births are complicated by shoulder dystocia. During a ten year period at the University of Mississippi Medical Center, the incidence of macrosomia, shoulder dystocia and subsequent brachial plexus injury was reviewed. The majority of instances (89 percent) of shoulder dystocia occurred in patients weighing less than 8 pounds 13 ounces at birth. In the current retrospective review, only 11 percent of the women had risk factors for macrosomia or shoulder dystocia and among these, none were identified prospectively. Additionally, 91 percent of patients with brachial plexus injury recovered with no sequelae. One instance of brachial plexus injury occurred at the time of cesarean section. These data reveal that macrosomia and subsequent shoulder dystocia cannot be predicted. Therefore, it is not feasible to prevent brachial plexus injury prospectively by prophylactic cesarean section. Great clinical acumen and technical expertise by the obstetrician using a variety of methods may be useful in avoiding, as much as possible, injury to the mother and fetus when shoulder dystocia does occur.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 46 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Dystocia of the shoulder is an unpredictable obstetric emergency that may result in injury to the mother or fetus. In an effort to reduce such risks, attempts have been made to identify patients having a fetus who may subsequently develop shoulder dystocia. The literature, however, clearly reflects that even the combination of prenatal historic facts, estimated fetal weight and sequence of intrapartum events is ineffective in prospectively identifying infants whose births are complicated by shoulder dystocia. During a ten year period at the University of Mississippi Medical Center, the incidence of macrosomia, shoulder dystocia and subsequent brachial plexus injury was reviewed. The majority of instances (89 percent) of shoulder dystocia occurred in patients weighing less than 8 pounds 13 ounces at birth. In the current retrospective review, only 11 percent of the women had risk factors for macrosomia or shoulder dystocia and among these, none were identified prospectively. Additionally, 91 percent of patients with brachial plexus injury recovered with no sequelae. One instance of brachial plexus injury occurred at the time of cesarean section. These data reveal that macrosomia and subsequent shoulder dystocia cannot be predicted. Therefore, it is not feasible to prevent brachial plexus injury prospectively by prophylactic cesarean section. Great clinical acumen and technical expertise by the obstetrician using a variety of methods may be useful in avoiding, as much as possible, injury to the mother and fetus when shoulder dystocia does occur.

Key concepts: Shoulder dystocia, Medicine, Brachial plexus injury, Brachial plexus, Fetal macrosomia, Birth injury, Obstetrics, Incidence (geometry)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The diagnosis and management of dystocia of the shoulder. — Research Paper | ScholarLens