Prevalence and clinical profiles of 'autoantibody-negative' systemic sclerosis subjects.
Marie Hudson, Masaaki Satoh, Jason Chan, Solène Tatibouet, Sonal Mehra, Maayan Baron, M J Fritzler
Abstract
Marie Hudson, Masaaki Satoh, Jason Chan, Solène Tatibouet, Sonal Mehra, Maayan Baron, M J Fritzler
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of autoantibody negative systemic sclerosis (SSc) and to identify the clinical correlates thereof. METHODS: Clinical data and sera from 874 SSc subjects were collected and autoantibodies were tested in a central laboratory using 1) indirect immunofluorescence (IIF), 2) commercially available ELISA, addressable laser bead immunoassay (ALBIA), and line immunoassay (LIA), and 3) a sensitive immunoprecipitation (IP) assay. RESULTS: Fifteen (15; 1.7%) subjects were autoantibody negative by IIF, ELISA, ALBIA, LIA and IP, and 16 (1.8%) were antinuclear antibody (ANA) positive by IIF but otherwise negative by ELISA, ALBIA, LIA and IP. Thirty-seven (37; 4.2%) were ANA positive by IIF, autoantibody negative by commercially available immunoassays, but had autoantibodies identified by IP (including Th/To in 20). Autoantibody-negative subjects had generally less severe disease than positive subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Autoantibody-negative SSc is rare (<2%) and appears to be associated with a favourable prognosis.
OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of autoantibody negative systemic sclerosis (SSc) and to identify the clinical correlates thereof. METHODS: Clinical data and sera from 874 SSc subjects were collected and autoantibodies were tested in a central laboratory using 1) indirect immunofluorescence (IIF), 2) commercially available ELISA, addressable laser bead immunoassay (ALBIA), and line immunoassay (LIA), and 3) a sensitive immunoprecipitation (IP) assay. RESULTS: Fifteen (15; 1.7%) subjects were autoantibody negative by IIF, ELISA, ALBIA, LIA and IP, and 16 (1.8%) were antinuclear antibody (ANA) positive by IIF but otherwise negative by ELISA, ALBIA, LIA and IP. Thirty-seven (37; 4.2%) were ANA positive by IIF, autoantibody negative by commercially available immunoassays, but had autoantibodies identified by IP (including Th/To in 20). Autoantibody-negative subjects had generally less severe disease than positive subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Autoantibody-negative SSc is rare (<2%) and appears to be associated with a favourable prognosis.
Key concepts: IIf, Autoantibody, Medicine, Anti-nuclear antibody, Immunoassay, Immunology, Antibody, Autoimmune disease