2004PubMedOpen access

Evidence-based management?

Paul Kamill

Open full text 4 citations

Abstract

The series of articles in the British Journal of General Practice have provoked some thought, for me, concerning the imminent introduction of Advanced Access to our practice.1-4 We were among the practices recruited to the National Primary Care Collaborative (NPCC) first wave. During the last 3 years we have been developing other aspects of our practice. In particular, the infrastructure, which includes both the building in which we work, and the use of the IT resources to become ‘paper-light’. We have also become a personal medical services practice, in which, theoretically, patients are no longer allocated to an individual GP. Patients are, however, traditionalists, and cling to the idea of being registered with an individual practitioner. As has been noted for emergency care, ‘inverting pyramids takes time’.5 The writer of this letter to the BMJ , a consultant in accident and emergency, made the erroneous observation that ‘in primary care most …

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The series of articles in the British Journal of General Practice have provoked some thought, for me, concerning the imminent introduction of Advanced Access to our practice.1-4 We were among the practices recruited to the National Primary Care Collaborative (NPCC) first wave. During the last 3 years we have been developing other aspects of our practice. In particular, the infrastructure, which includes both the building in which we work, and the use of the IT resources to become ‘paper-light’. We have also become a personal medical services practice, in which, theoretically, patients are no longer allocated to an individual GP. Patients are, however, traditionalists, and cling to the idea of being registered with an individual practitioner. As has been noted for emergency care, ‘inverting pyramids takes time’.5 The writer of this letter to the BMJ , a consultant in accident and emergency, made the erroneous observation that ‘in primary care most …

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The series of articles in the British Journal of General Practice have provoked some thought, for me, concerning the imminent introduction of Advanced Access to our practice.1-4 We were among the practices recruited to the National Primary Care Collaborative (NPCC) first wave. During the last 3 years we have been developing other aspects of our practice. In particular, the infrastructure, which includes both the building in which we work, and the use of the IT resources to become ‘paper-light’. We have also become a personal medical services practice, in which, theoretically, patients are no longer allocated to an individual GP. Patients are, however, traditionalists, and cling to the idea of being registered with an individual practitioner. As has been noted for emergency care, ‘inverting pyramids takes time’.5 The writer of this letter to the BMJ , a consultant in accident and emergency, made the erroneous observation that ‘in primary care most …

Key concepts: Accident and emergency, General practice, Primary care, Medicine, Work (physics), Good practice, Medical education, Nursing

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evidence-based management? — Research Paper | ScholarLens