2007Transportation Research Board 86th Annual MeetingTransportation Research BoardRequires access

Evaluation of Weigh-in-Motion Data for Developing Axle Load Distribution Factors for Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide

Nam Tran, Kevin D. Hall

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Axle load spectra are essential to structural pavement design using the new Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) developed under National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Project 1-37A. The axle load spectra can only be determined from traffic data collected at weigh-in-motion (WIM) stations. Studies have shown that traffic data collected at WIM sites, especially for those using temperature-dependent piezoelectric sensors, often have errors. Thus, quality control checks should be performed on the WIM data which are used for developing the design inputs. This paper presents the results of an extensive quality control evaluation of traffic data collected at 25 WIM sites selected for the development of statewide axle load spectra in Arkansas. The data were evaluated using the quality control procedure recommended by the Long Term Pavement Performance (LTPP) program. In addition, the influence of the WIM data accuracy on predicted pavement performance was also evaluated using the MEPDG software. Among the 25 sites, only ten stations provided WIM data suitable for the development of statewide axle load spectra in the MEPDG. Pavement performance predictions provided by the MEPDG software were found to be sensitive to underestimated and overestimated WIM data. The effect of misestimated WIM data can be minimized if the data meet the quality requirements specified by the LTPP.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Axle load spectra are essential to structural pavement design using the new Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) developed under National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Project 1-37A. The axle load spectra can only be determined from traffic data collected at weigh-in-motion (WIM) stations. Studies have shown that traffic data collected at WIM sites, especially for those using temperature-dependent piezoelectric sensors, often have errors. Thus, quality control checks should be performed on the WIM data which are used for developing the design inputs. This paper presents the results of an extensive quality control evaluation of traffic data collected at 25 WIM sites selected for the development of statewide axle load spectra in Arkansas. The data were evaluated using the quality control procedure recommended by the Long Term Pavement Performance (LTPP) program. In addition, the influence of the WIM data accuracy on predicted pavement performance was also evaluated using the MEPDG software. Among the 25 sites, only ten stations provided WIM data suitable for the development of statewide axle load spectra in the MEPDG. Pavement performance predictions provided by the MEPDG software were found to be sensitive to underestimated and overestimated WIM data. The effect of misestimated WIM data can be minimized if the data meet the quality requirements specified by the LTPP.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Axle load spectra are essential to structural pavement design using the new Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) developed under National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Project 1-37A. The axle load spectra can only be determined from traffic data collected at weigh-in-motion (WIM) stations. Studies have shown that traffic data collected at WIM sites, especially for those using temperature-dependent piezoelectric sensors, often have errors. Thus, quality control checks should be performed on the WIM data which are used for developing the design inputs. This paper presents the results of an extensive quality control evaluation of traffic data collected at 25 WIM sites selected for the development of statewide axle load spectra in Arkansas. The data were evaluated using the quality control procedure recommended by the Long Term Pavement Performance (LTPP) program. In addition, the influence of the WIM data accuracy on predicted pavement performance was also evaluated using the MEPDG software. Among the 25 sites, only ten stations provided WIM data suitable for the development of statewide axle load spectra in the MEPDG. Pavement performance predictions provided by the MEPDG software were found to be sensitive to underestimated and overestimated WIM data. The effect of misestimated WIM data can be minimized if the data meet the quality requirements specified by the LTPP.

Key concepts: Weigh in motion, Axle load, Axle, Engineering, Transport engineering, Structural engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of Weigh-in-Motion Data for Developing Axle Load Distribution Factors for Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide — Research Paper | ScholarLens