2003•Unpublished venueRequires access

Airpower: Myths and Facts

Phillip S. Meilinger

Open publisher page 21 citations

Abstract

Airpower, especially strategic bombing, frequently generates controversy. Ever since the US Army bought its first "aeroplane" in 1909, debates have raged over the utility, effectiveness, efficiency, legality, and even the morality of airpower. These debates continue despite (or perhaps because of) the hundreds of books that have been written on the subject and the scores of examples witnessed, As the saying goes. certain topics tend to produce more heat than they do light. In some cases, the questions regarding air-power, strategic bombing, and their roles in war remain unanswerable or at least people fail to agree on the answers, Soldiers, sailors, and airmen approach war from different viewpoints and with differing service-cultural perspectives, which similarly influence others who write and speak about war. This is natural and perhaps advantageous fresh ideas are always useful. Unfortunately, much of the debate regarding airpower and strategic bombing has been colored by accusations, misconceptions, inaccuracies, myths, and simple untruths. If airpower needs criticizing and certainly there are times when criticism is appropriate it must be based on accurate information.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Airpower, especially strategic bombing, frequently generates controversy. Ever since the US Army bought its first "aeroplane" in 1909, debates have raged over the utility, effectiveness, efficiency, legality, and even the morality of airpower. These debates continue despite (or perhaps because of) the hundreds of books that have been written on the subject and the scores of examples witnessed, As the saying goes. certain topics tend to produce more heat than they do light. In some cases, the questions regarding air-power, strategic bombing, and their roles in war remain unanswerable or at least people fail to agree on the answers, Soldiers, sailors, and airmen approach war from different viewpoints and with differing service-cultural perspectives, which similarly influence others who write and speak about war. This is natural and perhaps advantageous fresh ideas are always useful. Unfortunately, much of the debate regarding airpower and strategic bombing has been colored by accusations, misconceptions, inaccuracies, myths, and simple untruths. If airpower needs criticizing and certainly there are times when criticism is appropriate it must be based on accurate information.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 21 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Airpower, especially strategic bombing, frequently generates controversy. Ever since the US Army bought its first "aeroplane" in 1909, debates have raged over the utility, effectiveness, efficiency, legality, and even the morality of airpower. These debates continue despite (or perhaps because of) the hundreds of books that have been written on the subject and the scores of examples witnessed, As the saying goes. certain topics tend to produce more heat than they do light. In some cases, the questions regarding air-power, strategic bombing, and their roles in war remain unanswerable or at least people fail to agree on the answers, Soldiers, sailors, and airmen approach war from different viewpoints and with differing service-cultural perspectives, which similarly influence others who write and speak about war. This is natural and perhaps advantageous fresh ideas are always useful. Unfortunately, much of the debate regarding airpower and strategic bombing has been colored by accusations, misconceptions, inaccuracies, myths, and simple untruths. If airpower needs criticizing and certainly there are times when criticism is appropriate it must be based on accurate information.

Key concepts: Mythology, Computer science, History, Classics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Airpower: Myths and Facts — Research Paper | ScholarLens