1985PubMedRequires access

Comparison of verbal typicality judgments of mentally retarded and nonretarded persons.

John J. Winters, David L. Hoats

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

In Phase I of this study, mentally retarded adults judged whether exemplars were members of their respective categories. In Phase II they judged how representative the exemplars were of their categories. Comparisons were made between this group and the nonretarded groups of Bjorklund, Thompson, and Ornstein (1983) and Uyeda and Mandler (1980). There was little evidence of a developmental relationship between typicality ratings given by retarded and nonretarded persons, but there were significant relationships among the groups for specific categories. Relationships were more category-than mental age-dependent. Other analyses indicated that Rosch's (1975) finding that typical exemplars are incorporated into category structures prior to atypical exemplars was replicated with retarded persons.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In Phase I of this study, mentally retarded adults judged whether exemplars were members of their respective categories. In Phase II they judged how representative the exemplars were of their categories. Comparisons were made between this group and the nonretarded groups of Bjorklund, Thompson, and Ornstein (1983) and Uyeda and Mandler (1980). There was little evidence of a developmental relationship between typicality ratings given by retarded and nonretarded persons, but there were significant relationships among the groups for specific categories. Relationships were more category-than mental age-dependent. Other analyses indicated that Rosch's (1975) finding that typical exemplars are incorporated into category structures prior to atypical exemplars was replicated with retarded persons.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In Phase I of this study, mentally retarded adults judged whether exemplars were members of their respective categories. In Phase II they judged how representative the exemplars were of their categories. Comparisons were made between this group and the nonretarded groups of Bjorklund, Thompson, and Ornstein (1983) and Uyeda and Mandler (1980). There was little evidence of a developmental relationship between typicality ratings given by retarded and nonretarded persons, but there were significant relationships among the groups for specific categories. Relationships were more category-than mental age-dependent. Other analyses indicated that Rosch's (1975) finding that typical exemplars are incorporated into category structures prior to atypical exemplars was replicated with retarded persons.

Key concepts: Mentally retarded, Psychology, Developmental psychology, Cognitive psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of verbal typicality judgments of mentally retarded and nonretarded persons. — Research Paper | ScholarLens