2011WorkRequires access

Industrial workers with occupational hand injury from Tehran factories

Maryam Maghsoudipour, Zohre Sarfaraz

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was evaluation of occupational and non-occupational risk factors in workers with occupational hand injury. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-two workers with occupational hand injury as cases and 83 controls matched for age, gender and also occupation, were included in the study. Controls were chosen randomly from the same factories and the same jobs but they did not have occupational hand injury. METHODS: The study utilized a case control design for analysis. Working circumstances were assessed using a detailed occupational questionnaire as well as non-occupational factors. The questionnaire was completed for both cases and controls. Multivariate logistic regression modeling was used to test the association between occupational and non-occupational factors and hand injury. RESULTS: Risk factors for occupational hand injury were: rotational shift work, working in the early hours in the morning, working alone; and protective factors were: availability of safety equipment or having the equipment equipped with safety tools, safety education and using safety equipment. Adjusted for confounding factors, protective factors were: availability of safety equipment or having the equipment equipped with safety tools and the risk factor was working alone. CONCLUSION: Some occupational factors are protective and some increase risk for occupational hand injury. By modifying these factors we may decrease the prevalence of occupational hand injuries.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was evaluation of occupational and non-occupational risk factors in workers with occupational hand injury. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-two workers with occupational hand injury as cases and 83 controls matched for age, gender and also occupation, were included in the study. Controls were chosen randomly from the same factories and the same jobs but they did not have occupational hand injury. METHODS: The study utilized a case control design for analysis. Working circumstances were assessed using a detailed occupational questionnaire as well as non-occupational factors. The questionnaire was completed for both cases and controls. Multivariate logistic regression modeling was used to test the association between occupational and non-occupational factors and hand injury. RESULTS: Risk factors for occupational hand injury were: rotational shift work, working in the early hours in the morning, working alone; and protective factors were: availability of safety equipment or having the equipment equipped with safety tools, safety education and using safety equipment. Adjusted for confounding factors, protective factors were: availability of safety equipment or having the equipment equipped with safety tools and the risk factor was working alone. CONCLUSION: Some occupational factors are protective and some increase risk for occupational hand injury. By modifying these factors we may decrease the prevalence of occupational hand injuries.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was evaluation of occupational and non-occupational risk factors in workers with occupational hand injury. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-two workers with occupational hand injury as cases and 83 controls matched for age, gender and also occupation, were included in the study. Controls were chosen randomly from the same factories and the same jobs but they did not have occupational hand injury. METHODS: The study utilized a case control design for analysis. Working circumstances were assessed using a detailed occupational questionnaire as well as non-occupational factors. The questionnaire was completed for both cases and controls. Multivariate logistic regression modeling was used to test the association between occupational and non-occupational factors and hand injury. RESULTS: Risk factors for occupational hand injury were: rotational shift work, working in the early hours in the morning, working alone; and protective factors were: availability of safety equipment or having the equipment equipped with safety tools, safety education and using safety equipment. Adjusted for confounding factors, protective factors were: availability of safety equipment or having the equipment equipped with safety tools and the risk factor was working alone. CONCLUSION: Some occupational factors are protective and some increase risk for occupational hand injury. By modifying these factors we may decrease the prevalence of occupational hand injuries.

Key concepts: Occupational injury, Occupational safety and health, Medicine, Logistic regression, Personal protective equipment, Environmental health, Human factors and ergonomics, Injury prevention

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Industrial workers with occupational hand injury from Tehran factories — Research Paper | ScholarLens