1986The Reading TeacherRequires access

Teaching Question Answer Relationships, Revisited.

Taffy E. Raphael

Open publisher page 156 citations

Abstract

students love working with QARs, it really helps them find infor mation in their textbooks, but some times they're confused by the difference between Right There and Think and Search. What should I do? Can an On My Own have some in formation from the text? I'd like to use QAR as more of a framework for seeking information than your articles suggest; any ideas of how to approach this? These are only a few of the types of comments I have received from class room teachers who use Question An swer Relationships (QAR). Because of such questions, and because of the many useful suggestions received from teachers, I have modified and updated the original QAR program (Raphael, 1982; 1984). These modifications have provided (1) a clearer explanation of different sources of information for answering questions, (2) an easier for mat for considering developmental dif ferences in teaching and learning QARs, and (3) an expanded use of QARs as both a tool for teachers and a strategy for students.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

students love working with QARs, it really helps them find infor mation in their textbooks, but some times they're confused by the difference between Right There and Think and Search. What should I do? Can an On My Own have some in formation from the text? I'd like to use QAR as more of a framework for seeking information than your articles suggest; any ideas of how to approach this? These are only a few of the types of comments I have received from class room teachers who use Question An swer Relationships (QAR). Because of such questions, and because of the many useful suggestions received from teachers, I have modified and updated the original QAR program (Raphael, 1982; 1984). These modifications have provided (1) a clearer explanation of different sources of information for answering questions, (2) an easier for mat for considering developmental dif ferences in teaching and learning QARs, and (3) an expanded use of QARs as both a tool for teachers and a strategy for students.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 156 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

students love working with QARs, it really helps them find infor mation in their textbooks, but some times they're confused by the difference between Right There and Think and Search. What should I do? Can an On My Own have some in formation from the text? I'd like to use QAR as more of a framework for seeking information than your articles suggest; any ideas of how to approach this? These are only a few of the types of comments I have received from class room teachers who use Question An swer Relationships (QAR). Because of such questions, and because of the many useful suggestions received from teachers, I have modified and updated the original QAR program (Raphael, 1982; 1984). These modifications have provided (1) a clearer explanation of different sources of information for answering questions, (2) an easier for mat for considering developmental dif ferences in teaching and learning QARs, and (3) an expanded use of QARs as both a tool for teachers and a strategy for students.

Key concepts: Psychology, Class (philosophy), Mathematics education, Teaching method, Pedagogy, Epistemology, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Teaching Question Answer Relationships, Revisited. — Research Paper | ScholarLens