1999Journal of Nursing EducationRequires access

Evaluation of Graduates of an Associate Degree Nursing Program

Salva Failla, M Maher, Charles A Duffy

Open publisher page 15 citations

Abstract

Approximately 58% of the RN nursing programs in the United States are associate degree programs (ADN). The curricula of these programs are designed to prepare graduates to competently provide direct patient care. The purpose of this descriptive comparative study was to evaluate the nursing performance of ADN graduates as perceived by graduates, faculty, and employers. In the first phase of the study, graduates and faculty completed the Six-Dimension Scale of Nursing Performance (6-DSNP) at the time of graduation. Six months later, the graduates again were asked to complete the same questionnaire along with their employers. Findings indicated a significant difference in the planning and evaluation performance of graduates at graduation and 6 months later as perceived by the graduates. Graduates rated themselves significantly higher in all areas of performance when compared to faculty and employers. There was no significant difference in the perception of graduate performance between faculty and employers. This outcome assessment provides needed data on perceptions of ADN programs.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Approximately 58% of the RN nursing programs in the United States are associate degree programs (ADN). The curricula of these programs are designed to prepare graduates to competently provide direct patient care. The purpose of this descriptive comparative study was to evaluate the nursing performance of ADN graduates as perceived by graduates, faculty, and employers. In the first phase of the study, graduates and faculty completed the Six-Dimension Scale of Nursing Performance (6-DSNP) at the time of graduation. Six months later, the graduates again were asked to complete the same questionnaire along with their employers. Findings indicated a significant difference in the planning and evaluation performance of graduates at graduation and 6 months later as perceived by the graduates. Graduates rated themselves significantly higher in all areas of performance when compared to faculty and employers. There was no significant difference in the perception of graduate performance between faculty and employers. This outcome assessment provides needed data on perceptions of ADN programs.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 15 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Approximately 58% of the RN nursing programs in the United States are associate degree programs (ADN). The curricula of these programs are designed to prepare graduates to competently provide direct patient care. The purpose of this descriptive comparative study was to evaluate the nursing performance of ADN graduates as perceived by graduates, faculty, and employers. In the first phase of the study, graduates and faculty completed the Six-Dimension Scale of Nursing Performance (6-DSNP) at the time of graduation. Six months later, the graduates again were asked to complete the same questionnaire along with their employers. Findings indicated a significant difference in the planning and evaluation performance of graduates at graduation and 6 months later as perceived by the graduates. Graduates rated themselves significantly higher in all areas of performance when compared to faculty and employers. There was no significant difference in the perception of graduate performance between faculty and employers. This outcome assessment provides needed data on perceptions of ADN programs.

Key concepts: Graduation (instrument), Curriculum, Medical education, Associate degree, Nursing, Psychology, Scale (ratio), Perception

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of Graduates of an Associate Degree Nursing Program — Research Paper | ScholarLens