2012•eScholarship (California Digital Library)Open access

Comparison of Zone Cooling Load for Radiant and All-Air Conditioning Systems

Jingjuan Dove Feng, Stefano Schiavon, Fred S. Bauman

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

By actively cooling down one or more surfaces in a space, water-based embedded surface cooling (radiant) systems remove heat both by convection and radiation. Therefore, unlike the case of well-mixed air distribution systems where the cooling load is purely convective, the cooling load for radiant systems is comprised of both convective and radiant components. However, in current practice, the same design cooling load calculation methods for the radiant systems are used as the convection based air systems. The purpose of this energy simulation study was to investigate if there are differences in peak zone cooling load and 24-hour total zone cooling energy generated by all-air distribution systems in comparison to radiant cooling systems. Sensitivity studies were performed for different load and boundary conditions. Simulation results show that total zone cooling energy for the radiant cooling systems studied can be 2.7-6.5% higher than the all-air systems, and peak zone cooling load can be in the range of 10-40% higher depending on the load conditions. Future research is needed to assess the implications for design guidelines. In general, even if the total zone level cooling energy may be slightly higher for the radiant systems, there are verified advantages of using hydronic-based radiant systems such as improved plant side equipment efficiency with warmer cold water temperature, possibility of night pre-cooling and utilization of natural cooling resource, and energy efficiency in transporting heat with water compared to air. All of these factors combine to produce better overall energy performance in radiant cooling systems.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

By actively cooling down one or more surfaces in a space, water-based embedded surface cooling (radiant) systems remove heat both by convection and radiation. Therefore, unlike the case of well-mixed air distribution systems where the cooling load is purely convective, the cooling load for radiant systems is comprised of both convective and radiant components. However, in current practice, the same design cooling load calculation methods for the radiant systems are used as the convection based air systems. The purpose of this energy simulation study was to investigate if there are differences in peak zone cooling load and 24-hour total zone cooling energy generated by all-air distribution systems in comparison to radiant cooling systems. Sensitivity studies were performed for different load and boundary conditions. Simulation results show that total zone cooling energy for the radiant cooling systems studied can be 2.7-6.5% higher than the all-air systems, and peak zone cooling load can be in the range of 10-40% higher depending on the load conditions. Future research is needed to assess the implications for design guidelines. In general, even if the total zone level cooling energy may be slightly higher for the radiant systems, there are verified advantages of using hydronic-based radiant systems such as improved plant side equipment efficiency with warmer cold water temperature, possibility of night pre-cooling and utilization of natural cooling resource, and energy efficiency in transporting heat with water compared to air. All of these factors combine to produce better overall energy performance in radiant cooling systems.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

By actively cooling down one or more surfaces in a space, water-based embedded surface cooling (radiant) systems remove heat both by convection and radiation. Therefore, unlike the case of well-mixed air distribution systems where the cooling load is purely convective, the cooling load for radiant systems is comprised of both convective and radiant components. However, in current practice, the same design cooling load calculation methods for the radiant systems are used as the convection based air systems. The purpose of this energy simulation study was to investigate if there are differences in peak zone cooling load and 24-hour total zone cooling energy generated by all-air distribution systems in comparison to radiant cooling systems. Sensitivity studies were performed for different load and boundary conditions. Simulation results show that total zone cooling energy for the radiant cooling systems studied can be 2.7-6.5% higher than the all-air systems, and peak zone cooling load can be in the range of 10-40% higher depending on the load conditions. Future research is needed to assess the implications for design guidelines. In general, even if the total zone level cooling energy may be slightly higher for the radiant systems, there are verified advantages of using hydronic-based radiant systems such as improved plant side equipment efficiency with warmer cold water temperature, possibility of night pre-cooling and utilization of natural cooling resource, and energy efficiency in transporting heat with water compared to air. All of these factors combine to produce better overall energy performance in radiant cooling systems.

Key concepts: Cooling load, Radiant cooling, Passive cooling, Environmental science, Water cooling, Air cooling, Radiative cooling, Radiant energy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of Zone Cooling Load for Radiant and All-Air Conditioning Systems — Research Paper | ScholarLens