2015PubMedOpen access

[The agreement and clinical value of hepatic vein pressure gradient and portal vein pressure in patients with portal hypertension].

Shanhong Tang, Jianping Qin, Ming-De Jiang, Qianwen He, Xin Yao, Weizheng Zeng, Ming Gu

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the agreement and correlation between hepatic vein pressure gradient (HVPG) and portal vein pressure (PVP) in patients with portal hypertension,and explore their clinical value. METHODS: A total of 46 patients with portal hypertension were directly measured the free hepatic pressure, wedged hepatic pressure, portal vein pressure before and after TIPS therapy. The agreement and correlation of HVPG and PVP were analyzed, and explore their clinical value. RESULTS: There is no significant agreement or correlation between HVPG and PVP in 5 patients, whose third hilar have large communicating branches between portal vein and Inferior vena cava, or with obvious umbilical vein opened. The HVPGs were significantly agreed with portal vein pressure in other 41 patients. There is no significant difference of HVPG or PVP between earlyTIPS and not early-TIPS groups. In addition, the portal vein pressures after TIPS were significantly decreased compared with that before TIPS. CONCLUSION: The HVPG can well show the PVP except these with obvious communicating branches between portal vein and Inferior vena cava in third hilar, and TIPS can effectively decrease the portal vein pressure in patients with portal hypertension.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the agreement and correlation between hepatic vein pressure gradient (HVPG) and portal vein pressure (PVP) in patients with portal hypertension,and explore their clinical value. METHODS: A total of 46 patients with portal hypertension were directly measured the free hepatic pressure, wedged hepatic pressure, portal vein pressure before and after TIPS therapy. The agreement and correlation of HVPG and PVP were analyzed, and explore their clinical value. RESULTS: There is no significant agreement or correlation between HVPG and PVP in 5 patients, whose third hilar have large communicating branches between portal vein and Inferior vena cava, or with obvious umbilical vein opened. The HVPGs were significantly agreed with portal vein pressure in other 41 patients. There is no significant difference of HVPG or PVP between earlyTIPS and not early-TIPS groups. In addition, the portal vein pressures after TIPS were significantly decreased compared with that before TIPS. CONCLUSION: The HVPG can well show the PVP except these with obvious communicating branches between portal vein and Inferior vena cava in third hilar, and TIPS can effectively decrease the portal vein pressure in patients with portal hypertension.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the agreement and correlation between hepatic vein pressure gradient (HVPG) and portal vein pressure (PVP) in patients with portal hypertension,and explore their clinical value. METHODS: A total of 46 patients with portal hypertension were directly measured the free hepatic pressure, wedged hepatic pressure, portal vein pressure before and after TIPS therapy. The agreement and correlation of HVPG and PVP were analyzed, and explore their clinical value. RESULTS: There is no significant agreement or correlation between HVPG and PVP in 5 patients, whose third hilar have large communicating branches between portal vein and Inferior vena cava, or with obvious umbilical vein opened. The HVPGs were significantly agreed with portal vein pressure in other 41 patients. There is no significant difference of HVPG or PVP between earlyTIPS and not early-TIPS groups. In addition, the portal vein pressures after TIPS were significantly decreased compared with that before TIPS. CONCLUSION: The HVPG can well show the PVP except these with obvious communicating branches between portal vein and Inferior vena cava in third hilar, and TIPS can effectively decrease the portal vein pressure in patients with portal hypertension.

Key concepts: Portal venous pressure, Medicine, Portal hypertension, Right gastric vein, Portal vein, Umbilical vein, Inferior vena cava, Vein

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[The agreement and clinical value of hepatic vein pressure gradient and portal vein pressure in patients with portal hypertension]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens