2017Unpublished venueRequires access

Equity in Education: A Low Priority in the School Reform Movement

Faustine C. Jones‐Wilson

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Educational reform movements occur in cyclical fashion, often in response to crisis—real or perceived. The educational needs of children and youth who have not had the economic, social, environmental opportunities, or advantages enjoyed by the dominant group receive minimal attention in most of the school reform reports. The school reform reports focus on what they see as the improvement of education in general. The cure for mediocrity, as well as the core of the new reform movement, has been a full dose of "excellence." Of very low priority now, as in the 1957 period, is an emphasis on equity for those individuals and groups who are underprivileged and underachieving in comparison with majority-group persons. Most of the reports contain recommendations to reduce electives and concentrate on the customary college-bound program, perhaps with more science and mathematics added. Concrete recommendations for improving public secondary education made by James B.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Educational reform movements occur in cyclical fashion, often in response to crisis—real or perceived. The educational needs of children and youth who have not had the economic, social, environmental opportunities, or advantages enjoyed by the dominant group receive minimal attention in most of the school reform reports. The school reform reports focus on what they see as the improvement of education in general. The cure for mediocrity, as well as the core of the new reform movement, has been a full dose of "excellence." Of very low priority now, as in the 1957 period, is an emphasis on equity for those individuals and groups who are underprivileged and underachieving in comparison with majority-group persons. Most of the reports contain recommendations to reduce electives and concentrate on the customary college-bound program, perhaps with more science and mathematics added. Concrete recommendations for improving public secondary education made by James B.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Educational reform movements occur in cyclical fashion, often in response to crisis—real or perceived. The educational needs of children and youth who have not had the economic, social, environmental opportunities, or advantages enjoyed by the dominant group receive minimal attention in most of the school reform reports. The school reform reports focus on what they see as the improvement of education in general. The cure for mediocrity, as well as the core of the new reform movement, has been a full dose of "excellence." Of very low priority now, as in the 1957 period, is an emphasis on equity for those individuals and groups who are underprivileged and underachieving in comparison with majority-group persons. Most of the reports contain recommendations to reduce electives and concentrate on the customary college-bound program, perhaps with more science and mathematics added. Concrete recommendations for improving public secondary education made by James B.

Key concepts: Equity (law), Movement (music), Political science, Public administration, Compensatory education, Reform movement, Economic growth, Pedagogy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Equity in Education: A Low Priority in the School Reform Movement — Research Paper | ScholarLens