The incidence of concha bullosa and the correlation with nasal septal deviation.
Amir Arvin Sazgar, Jafar Massah, Mohammad Sadeghi, Abbas S. Bagheri, Farhan Rasool
Abstract
Amir Arvin Sazgar, Jafar Massah, Mohammad Sadeghi, Abbas S. Bagheri, Farhan Rasool
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To analyse the incidence of concha bullosa and any aetiological correlation with nasal septal deviation. METHODOLOGY: Paranasal sinus computerised tomography (CT) scans were made of 143 consecutive patients with sinonasal symptoms. Patients with altered anatomy (iatrogenic or pathological) were excluded and the remaining CT scans were analysed for the pneumatisation of the middle turbinate, septal deviation and the correlation between them. RESULTS: Sixty-three percent of patients had some types of septal deviation and 35% had unilateral or bilateral concha bullosa. Septal deviation was present in 9 out of 13 patients (69.2%) with large unilateral or dominant concha bullosa, 10 out of 24 (41.7%) with medium unilateral or dominant concha bullosa, and 12 out of 30 (40%) with small concha bullosa. There was a clear link between the presence of a unilateral concha, or a dominant concha (in bilateral concha), and the presence of nasal septal deviation (P <0.009). CONCLUSIONS: After the assessment of various sizes and shape of concha bullosa and the form of nasal septal deviation away from the dominant concha, we suggest that deviation is an indirect result of the presence of the concha. This hypothesis can be proved by reference to the laws of physics.
OpenAlex reports 34 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
OBJECTIVES: To analyse the incidence of concha bullosa and any aetiological correlation with nasal septal deviation. METHODOLOGY: Paranasal sinus computerised tomography (CT) scans were made of 143 consecutive patients with sinonasal symptoms. Patients with altered anatomy (iatrogenic or pathological) were excluded and the remaining CT scans were analysed for the pneumatisation of the middle turbinate, septal deviation and the correlation between them. RESULTS: Sixty-three percent of patients had some types of septal deviation and 35% had unilateral or bilateral concha bullosa. Septal deviation was present in 9 out of 13 patients (69.2%) with large unilateral or dominant concha bullosa, 10 out of 24 (41.7%) with medium unilateral or dominant concha bullosa, and 12 out of 30 (40%) with small concha bullosa. There was a clear link between the presence of a unilateral concha, or a dominant concha (in bilateral concha), and the presence of nasal septal deviation (P <0.009). CONCLUSIONS: After the assessment of various sizes and shape of concha bullosa and the form of nasal septal deviation away from the dominant concha, we suggest that deviation is an indirect result of the presence of the concha. This hypothesis can be proved by reference to the laws of physics.
Key concepts: Concha bullosa, Medicine, Nasal septum, Turbinates, Anatomy, Nose, Computed tomography, Radiology