2008Unpublished venueRequires access

Nuclear Waste: Policies and Prospects

Andrew Mayer, MonirIslam, Steven Tidwell, Randall Crock

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The PUREX Cycle Fuel reprocessing is the primary alternative to permanent storage. Through a variety of chemical reactions and physical separations, useful isotopes can be isolated and mixed back into reactors as MOX (Mixed Oxide fuel). The current standard, PUREX (Plutonium-Uranium Extraction) is a simpler process, and can reduce the amount of waste needing storage in HLW facilities by almost 50%. To do this the spent fuels are !rst dissolved in a strong acid, and then any particulates are !ltered out and disposed of. Then a second dissolution happens is an organic solvent to separate the Pu and U from the other actinides and !ssion products. The liquid is then separated into two solutions, one containing Pu and the other U. France has been using this method to process its waste for many years, and the process has proven commercially viable. However, it violates U.S. policies regarding nuclear proliferation. The PUREX process produces nearly pure plutonium, which the United States sees as a threat to security. Because of this, the U.S. is looking into the UREX processes, which have an even greater return. This gain comes from not using just the UREX methods, but combining them with other separations to minimize the waste which needs permanent storage. The UREX+ processes also eliminate the threat of nuclear weapons development since uranium and plutonium remain mixed throughout the process.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The PUREX Cycle Fuel reprocessing is the primary alternative to permanent storage. Through a variety of chemical reactions and physical separations, useful isotopes can be isolated and mixed back into reactors as MOX (Mixed Oxide fuel). The current standard, PUREX (Plutonium-Uranium Extraction) is a simpler process, and can reduce the amount of waste needing storage in HLW facilities by almost 50%. To do this the spent fuels are !rst dissolved in a strong acid, and then any particulates are !ltered out and disposed of. Then a second dissolution happens is an organic solvent to separate the Pu and U from the other actinides and !ssion products. The liquid is then separated into two solutions, one containing Pu and the other U. France has been using this method to process its waste for many years, and the process has proven commercially viable. However, it violates U.S. policies regarding nuclear proliferation. The PUREX process produces nearly pure plutonium, which the United States sees as a threat to security. Because of this, the U.S. is looking into the UREX processes, which have an even greater return. This gain comes from not using just the UREX methods, but combining them with other separations to minimize the waste which needs permanent storage. The UREX+ processes also eliminate the threat of nuclear weapons development since uranium and plutonium remain mixed throughout the process.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The PUREX Cycle Fuel reprocessing is the primary alternative to permanent storage. Through a variety of chemical reactions and physical separations, useful isotopes can be isolated and mixed back into reactors as MOX (Mixed Oxide fuel). The current standard, PUREX (Plutonium-Uranium Extraction) is a simpler process, and can reduce the amount of waste needing storage in HLW facilities by almost 50%. To do this the spent fuels are !rst dissolved in a strong acid, and then any particulates are !ltered out and disposed of. Then a second dissolution happens is an organic solvent to separate the Pu and U from the other actinides and !ssion products. The liquid is then separated into two solutions, one containing Pu and the other U. France has been using this method to process its waste for many years, and the process has proven commercially viable. However, it violates U.S. policies regarding nuclear proliferation. The PUREX process produces nearly pure plutonium, which the United States sees as a threat to security. Because of this, the U.S. is looking into the UREX processes, which have an even greater return. This gain comes from not using just the UREX methods, but combining them with other separations to minimize the waste which needs permanent storage. The UREX+ processes also eliminate the threat of nuclear weapons development since uranium and plutonium remain mixed throughout the process.

Key concepts: PUREX, Plutonium, Spent nuclear fuel, MOX fuel, Nuclear reprocessing, Nuclear fuel cycle, Waste management, Plutonium-240

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Nuclear Waste: Policies and Prospects — Research Paper | ScholarLens