1974•The Yale Law JournalOpen access

Congressional Authority to Restrict Lower Federal Court Jurisdiction

Theodore A. Eisenberg

Open full text 15 citations

Abstract

Separation of powers in the federal government inevitably generates conflicts among the branches.In recent years the executive branch's authority to impound funds appropriated by Congress' and to make war without congressional approval 2 has been questioned.In earlier days debate raged over the Supreme Court's authority to nullify legislation passed by Congress.3A recurrent example of this phenomenon has been the struggle between Congress and the judiciary over the scope of congressional control of federal court jurisdiction.The recent controversy over school busing has highlighted this problem.The problem is, however, neither novel nor peculiar to the busing issue.In considering the first judiciary act Congress debated the scope of its authority to regulate the jurisdiction of the federal courts.4 In the last twenty years unpopular decisions by federal courts, particularly the Supreme Court, have led to serious discussions of curtailing federal court jurisdiction.After Brown v. Board of Education 5 there was a movement to withdraw Supreme Court jurisdiction to hear school desegregation cases.0 During and after the McCarthy era, and perhaps in response to it, the Supreme Court conferred upon citizens what some felt to be unduly broad protection from legislative investigations.7 This prompted

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Separation of powers in the federal government inevitably generates conflicts among the branches.In recent years the executive branch's authority to impound funds appropriated by Congress' and to make war without congressional approval 2 has been questioned.In earlier days debate raged over the Supreme Court's authority to nullify legislation passed by Congress.3A recurrent example of this phenomenon has been the struggle between Congress and the judiciary over the scope of congressional control of federal court jurisdiction.The recent controversy over school busing has highlighted this problem.The problem is, however, neither novel nor peculiar to the busing issue.In considering the first judiciary act Congress debated the scope of its authority to regulate the jurisdiction of the federal courts.4 In the last twenty years unpopular decisions by federal courts, particularly the Supreme Court, have led to serious discussions of curtailing federal court jurisdiction.After Brown v. Board of Education 5 there was a movement to withdraw Supreme Court jurisdiction to hear school desegregation cases.0 During and after the McCarthy era, and perhaps in response to it, the Supreme Court conferred upon citizens what some felt to be unduly broad protection from legislative investigations.7 This prompted

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 15 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Separation of powers in the federal government inevitably generates conflicts among the branches.In recent years the executive branch's authority to impound funds appropriated by Congress' and to make war without congressional approval 2 has been questioned.In earlier days debate raged over the Supreme Court's authority to nullify legislation passed by Congress.3A recurrent example of this phenomenon has been the struggle between Congress and the judiciary over the scope of congressional control of federal court jurisdiction.The recent controversy over school busing has highlighted this problem.The problem is, however, neither novel nor peculiar to the busing issue.In considering the first judiciary act Congress debated the scope of its authority to regulate the jurisdiction of the federal courts.4 In the last twenty years unpopular decisions by federal courts, particularly the Supreme Court, have led to serious discussions of curtailing federal court jurisdiction.After Brown v. Board of Education 5 there was a movement to withdraw Supreme Court jurisdiction to hear school desegregation cases.0 During and after the McCarthy era, and perhaps in response to it, the Supreme Court conferred upon citizens what some felt to be unduly broad protection from legislative investigations.7 This prompted

Key concepts: Jurisdiction, Federal jurisdiction, Law, Exclusive jurisdiction, Federal court, Political science, Subject-matter jurisdiction, Original jurisdiction

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Congressional Authority to Restrict Lower Federal Court Jurisdiction — Research Paper | ScholarLens