2005e-Publications@Marquette (Marquette University)Requires access

Self-love and morality: Beyond egoism and altruism

Jing Li

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Pitrim Sorokin, one of the twentieth century's pioneer social scientists of altruism, defined the key problematic in altruism as "the tragedy of tribal altruism,'' or the fact that "in-group altruism" inevitably implies "out-group egoism." Sorokin believes that an exclusive group solidarity, group loyalty or tribal altruism has mercilessly set man against man, and group against group. It has killed more human beings, destroyed more cities and brought upon mankind more suffering than any other catastrophe. The need to move from tribal egoism to universal altruism remains as urgent in our era as it did before. If in-group altruism necessarily means out-group egoism, can human altruism ever extend beyond in-groups to embrace the entire human race? As to this point, it is worth noting that the concepts of in-group and out-group are relative, that it is possible to take the entire human race, even all sentient beings, as one group...

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Pitrim Sorokin, one of the twentieth century's pioneer social scientists of altruism, defined the key problematic in altruism as "the tragedy of tribal altruism,'' or the fact that "in-group altruism" inevitably implies "out-group egoism." Sorokin believes that an exclusive group solidarity, group loyalty or tribal altruism has mercilessly set man against man, and group against group. It has killed more human beings, destroyed more cities and brought upon mankind more suffering than any other catastrophe. The need to move from tribal egoism to universal altruism remains as urgent in our era as it did before. If in-group altruism necessarily means out-group egoism, can human altruism ever extend beyond in-groups to embrace the entire human race? As to this point, it is worth noting that the concepts of in-group and out-group are relative, that it is possible to take the entire human race, even all sentient beings, as one group...

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Pitrim Sorokin, one of the twentieth century's pioneer social scientists of altruism, defined the key problematic in altruism as "the tragedy of tribal altruism,'' or the fact that "in-group altruism" inevitably implies "out-group egoism." Sorokin believes that an exclusive group solidarity, group loyalty or tribal altruism has mercilessly set man against man, and group against group. It has killed more human beings, destroyed more cities and brought upon mankind more suffering than any other catastrophe. The need to move from tribal egoism to universal altruism remains as urgent in our era as it did before. If in-group altruism necessarily means out-group egoism, can human altruism ever extend beyond in-groups to embrace the entire human race? As to this point, it is worth noting that the concepts of in-group and out-group are relative, that it is possible to take the entire human race, even all sentient beings, as one group...

Key concepts: Ethical egoism, Altruism (biology), Morality, Social psychology, Psychology, Philosophy, Epistemology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Self-love and morality: Beyond egoism and altruism — Research Paper | ScholarLens