On Infinite Number and Distance
Jeremy Gwiazda
Abstract
Open-access reader
Jeremy Gwiazda
Abstract
Open-access reader
> context • The infinite has long been an area of philosophical and mathematical investigation.There are many puzzles and paradoxes that involve the infinite.> Problem • The goal of this paper is to answer the question: Which objects are the infinite numbers (when order is taken into account)?Though not currently considered a problem, I believe that it is of primary importance to identify properly the infinite numbers.> Method • The main method that I employ is conceptual analysis.In particular, I argue that the infinite numbers should be as much like the finite numbers as possible.> results • Using finite numbers as our guide to the infinite numbers, it follows that infinite numbers are of the structure w + (w* + w) a + w*.This same structure also arises when a large finite number is under investigation.> implications • A first implication of the paper is that infinite numbers may be large finite numbers that have not been investigated fully.A second implication is that there is no number of finite numbers.Third, a number of paradoxes of the infinite are resolved.One change that should occur as a result of these findings is that "infinitely many" should refer to structures of the form w + (w* + w) a + w*; in contrast, there are "indefinitely many" natural numbers.> constructivist content • The constructivist perspective of the paper is a form of strict finitism.
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
> context • The infinite has long been an area of philosophical and mathematical investigation.There are many puzzles and paradoxes that involve the infinite.> Problem • The goal of this paper is to answer the question: Which objects are the infinite numbers (when order is taken into account)?Though not currently considered a problem, I believe that it is of primary importance to identify properly the infinite numbers.> Method • The main method that I employ is conceptual analysis.In particular, I argue that the infinite numbers should be as much like the finite numbers as possible.> results • Using finite numbers as our guide to the infinite numbers, it follows that infinite numbers are of the structure w + (w* + w) a + w*.This same structure also arises when a large finite number is under investigation.> implications • A first implication of the paper is that infinite numbers may be large finite numbers that have not been investigated fully.A second implication is that there is no number of finite numbers.Third, a number of paradoxes of the infinite are resolved.One change that should occur as a result of these findings is that "infinitely many" should refer to structures of the form w + (w* + w) a + w*; in contrast, there are "indefinitely many" natural numbers.> constructivist content • The constructivist perspective of the paper is a form of strict finitism.
Key concepts: Enactivism, Neurophenomenology, Autopoiesis, Constructivism (international relations), Epistemology, Context (archaeology), Mathematics, Calculus (dental)