2005Journal of Animal and Feed SciencesOpen access

Comparison of three non-linear models for describing Japanese quail growth curve

M. Sezer, Sefa Tarhan

Open full text 9 citations

Abstract

This study has focused on the comparison of Richards, Gompertz and Logistic growth models (functions) for describing the growth characteristics of three meat-type lines of Japanese quail.The live body weight data of wild-type, doted-white and extended-brown quail lines over time were collected and fitted to the three non-linear equations.The prediction performance of the models was evaluated by statistical error tests: mean percentage error (MPE), mean bias error (MBE), root mean square error (RMSE), and confidence interval test (CIT) using the data of three out bred lines of Japanese quails (dotted white, extended brown and wild in plumage colour).The prediction performance of the growth functions for the quail growth curves depends on the line and sex of quails as shown by the results of statistical error tests.In general, Richards function predicted the weight of quails better than other two growth functions.Commonly used statistical error tests (MPE, MBE and RMSE) may not reflect the prediction performance of growth models as accurately as confidence interval test.Confidence interval tests generated likeness percentage values between 82.35 and 100% for Richards growth function.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study has focused on the comparison of Richards, Gompertz and Logistic growth models (functions) for describing the growth characteristics of three meat-type lines of Japanese quail.The live body weight data of wild-type, doted-white and extended-brown quail lines over time were collected and fitted to the three non-linear equations.The prediction performance of the models was evaluated by statistical error tests: mean percentage error (MPE), mean bias error (MBE), root mean square error (RMSE), and confidence interval test (CIT) using the data of three out bred lines of Japanese quails (dotted white, extended brown and wild in plumage colour).The prediction performance of the growth functions for the quail growth curves depends on the line and sex of quails as shown by the results of statistical error tests.In general, Richards function predicted the weight of quails better than other two growth functions.Commonly used statistical error tests (MPE, MBE and RMSE) may not reflect the prediction performance of growth models as accurately as confidence interval test.Confidence interval tests generated likeness percentage values between 82.35 and 100% for Richards growth function.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study has focused on the comparison of Richards, Gompertz and Logistic growth models (functions) for describing the growth characteristics of three meat-type lines of Japanese quail.The live body weight data of wild-type, doted-white and extended-brown quail lines over time were collected and fitted to the three non-linear equations.The prediction performance of the models was evaluated by statistical error tests: mean percentage error (MPE), mean bias error (MBE), root mean square error (RMSE), and confidence interval test (CIT) using the data of three out bred lines of Japanese quails (dotted white, extended brown and wild in plumage colour).The prediction performance of the growth functions for the quail growth curves depends on the line and sex of quails as shown by the results of statistical error tests.In general, Richards function predicted the weight of quails better than other two growth functions.Commonly used statistical error tests (MPE, MBE and RMSE) may not reflect the prediction performance of growth models as accurately as confidence interval test.Confidence interval tests generated likeness percentage values between 82.35 and 100% for Richards growth function.

Key concepts: Quail, Growth curve (statistics), Growth model, Animal model, Biology, Animal science, Veterinary medicine, Zoology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of three non-linear models for describing Japanese quail growth curve — Research Paper | ScholarLens