1996PubMedRequires access

Studies on the use of digital radiography for the assessment of periapical bone lesions.

Boel Kullendorff

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The aim was to study digital radiography and to evaluate the influence of image processing on digital dental radiographs for the assessment of periapical lesions. In four studies, artificial bone lesions were made periapically and interradicularly in the mandibular premolar and molar regions. In a clinical study, direct digital radiographic images depicting the periapical bone tissue of different regions were assessed. Digital subtraction was performed on digitised conventional periapical radiographs. The observer performance was significantly better for the subtraction images than for the conventional radiographs, in particular for the detection of shallow lesions. Periapical bone lesions were easier to detect than interradicular lesions. Direct digtal radiography was performed with a CCD sensor based imaging system, Visualix/VIXA. The high-contrast resolution and the low-contrast resolution of the digital imaging system and of conventional radiographic E-speed film was evaluated. The high-contrast resolution was superior for E-speed film, whereas the low-contrast resolution was comparable for the two imaging systems. The properties of phantom material are discussed. When two different kinds of detectors, as a radiographic film and a sensor, are compared, a plexiglass phantom is to be preferred. Observer performance was comparable for direct digital radiography and E-speed film when assessing the artificial periapical bone lesions. In the clinical study, E-speed film performed slightly better. Image processing did not improve the observer performance.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The aim was to study digital radiography and to evaluate the influence of image processing on digital dental radiographs for the assessment of periapical lesions. In four studies, artificial bone lesions were made periapically and interradicularly in the mandibular premolar and molar regions. In a clinical study, direct digital radiographic images depicting the periapical bone tissue of different regions were assessed. Digital subtraction was performed on digitised conventional periapical radiographs. The observer performance was significantly better for the subtraction images than for the conventional radiographs, in particular for the detection of shallow lesions. Periapical bone lesions were easier to detect than interradicular lesions. Direct digtal radiography was performed with a CCD sensor based imaging system, Visualix/VIXA. The high-contrast resolution and the low-contrast resolution of the digital imaging system and of conventional radiographic E-speed film was evaluated. The high-contrast resolution was superior for E-speed film, whereas the low-contrast resolution was comparable for the two imaging systems. The properties of phantom material are discussed. When two different kinds of detectors, as a radiographic film and a sensor, are compared, a plexiglass phantom is to be preferred. Observer performance was comparable for direct digital radiography and E-speed film when assessing the artificial periapical bone lesions. In the clinical study, E-speed film performed slightly better. Image processing did not improve the observer performance.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The aim was to study digital radiography and to evaluate the influence of image processing on digital dental radiographs for the assessment of periapical lesions. In four studies, artificial bone lesions were made periapically and interradicularly in the mandibular premolar and molar regions. In a clinical study, direct digital radiographic images depicting the periapical bone tissue of different regions were assessed. Digital subtraction was performed on digitised conventional periapical radiographs. The observer performance was significantly better for the subtraction images than for the conventional radiographs, in particular for the detection of shallow lesions. Periapical bone lesions were easier to detect than interradicular lesions. Direct digtal radiography was performed with a CCD sensor based imaging system, Visualix/VIXA. The high-contrast resolution and the low-contrast resolution of the digital imaging system and of conventional radiographic E-speed film was evaluated. The high-contrast resolution was superior for E-speed film, whereas the low-contrast resolution was comparable for the two imaging systems. The properties of phantom material are discussed. When two different kinds of detectors, as a radiographic film and a sensor, are compared, a plexiglass phantom is to be preferred. Observer performance was comparable for direct digital radiography and E-speed film when assessing the artificial periapical bone lesions. In the clinical study, E-speed film performed slightly better. Image processing did not improve the observer performance.

Key concepts: Radiography, Imaging phantom, Subtraction, Medicine, Digital radiography, Nuclear medicine, Digital imaging, Digital image

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Studies on the use of digital radiography for the assessment of periapical bone lesions. — Research Paper | ScholarLens