2008•Unpublished venueRequires access

1 Expanding the Circle: Comparative Legal Studies in Transition

Sarah Biddulph, Pip Nicholson

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

The plurality of legal systems, including morally infused law, coupled with the law-practice gap, requires scholars explicitly and critically to examine assumptions about the significance of positive law. In her discussion of the relationship between comparative law and socio-legal studies, Annelise Riles has noted that comparative law and socio-legal studies now share a range of methodologies and topics of inquiry. In studies of legal change and legal pluralism in particular, and aided by the methodologies of socio-legal scholarship, comparative legal studies has started to move away from its focus on state law and institutions to adopt more broadly framed approaches to its inquiries. The legacy of colonialism throughout south-east Asia has created national systems comprising a complex of domestic, foreign, local, colonial and neocolonial legal regimes each of which have evolved, intertwined and are now used as resources in power struggles within these countries. Keywords: comparative law; comparative legal studies; legal pluralism; legal systems; socio-legal studies; south-east Asia

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The plurality of legal systems, including morally infused law, coupled with the law-practice gap, requires scholars explicitly and critically to examine assumptions about the significance of positive law. In her discussion of the relationship between comparative law and socio-legal studies, Annelise Riles has noted that comparative law and socio-legal studies now share a range of methodologies and topics of inquiry. In studies of legal change and legal pluralism in particular, and aided by the methodologies of socio-legal scholarship, comparative legal studies has started to move away from its focus on state law and institutions to adopt more broadly framed approaches to its inquiries. The legacy of colonialism throughout south-east Asia has created national systems comprising a complex of domestic, foreign, local, colonial and neocolonial legal regimes each of which have evolved, intertwined and are now used as resources in power struggles within these countries. Keywords: comparative law; comparative legal studies; legal pluralism; legal systems; socio-legal studies; south-east Asia

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The plurality of legal systems, including morally infused law, coupled with the law-practice gap, requires scholars explicitly and critically to examine assumptions about the significance of positive law. In her discussion of the relationship between comparative law and socio-legal studies, Annelise Riles has noted that comparative law and socio-legal studies now share a range of methodologies and topics of inquiry. In studies of legal change and legal pluralism in particular, and aided by the methodologies of socio-legal scholarship, comparative legal studies has started to move away from its focus on state law and institutions to adopt more broadly framed approaches to its inquiries. The legacy of colonialism throughout south-east Asia has created national systems comprising a complex of domestic, foreign, local, colonial and neocolonial legal regimes each of which have evolved, intertwined and are now used as resources in power struggles within these countries. Keywords: comparative law; comparative legal studies; legal pluralism; legal systems; socio-legal studies; south-east Asia

Key concepts: Legal pluralism, Comparative law, Legal profession, Empirical legal studies, Legal realism, Political science, Legal research, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
1 Expanding the Circle: Comparative Legal Studies in Transition — Research Paper | ScholarLens