1993PubMedRequires access

33P is preferable to 35S for labeling probes used in in situ hybridization.

Susan K. McLaughlin, Robert F. Margolskee

Open publisher page 35 citations

Abstract

We compared RNA probes labeled with 35S-UTP and 33P-UTP for use in in situ hybridizations. 33P-UTP was readily incorporated into in vitro transcribed RNA, producing 33P-labeled riboprobes of high specific activity. When the 33P- and 35S-labeled riboprobes were compared in in situ hybridizations using two different tissues, we found that the 33P-labeled riboprobes were less "sticky" than the 35S-labeled riboprobes, giving significantly less nonspecific background hybridization. Because of the low level of background stickiness, it was possible to use ten times more 33P-labeled riboprobe than 35S-labeled riboprobe without appreciably increasing background hybridization. Our findings indicate that, in most cases, 33P is the isotope of choice when labeling probes for in situ hybridizations.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We compared RNA probes labeled with 35S-UTP and 33P-UTP for use in in situ hybridizations. 33P-UTP was readily incorporated into in vitro transcribed RNA, producing 33P-labeled riboprobes of high specific activity. When the 33P- and 35S-labeled riboprobes were compared in in situ hybridizations using two different tissues, we found that the 33P-labeled riboprobes were less "sticky" than the 35S-labeled riboprobes, giving significantly less nonspecific background hybridization. Because of the low level of background stickiness, it was possible to use ten times more 33P-labeled riboprobe than 35S-labeled riboprobe without appreciably increasing background hybridization. Our findings indicate that, in most cases, 33P is the isotope of choice when labeling probes for in situ hybridizations.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 35 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We compared RNA probes labeled with 35S-UTP and 33P-UTP for use in in situ hybridizations. 33P-UTP was readily incorporated into in vitro transcribed RNA, producing 33P-labeled riboprobes of high specific activity. When the 33P- and 35S-labeled riboprobes were compared in in situ hybridizations using two different tissues, we found that the 33P-labeled riboprobes were less "sticky" than the 35S-labeled riboprobes, giving significantly less nonspecific background hybridization. Because of the low level of background stickiness, it was possible to use ten times more 33P-labeled riboprobe than 35S-labeled riboprobe without appreciably increasing background hybridization. Our findings indicate that, in most cases, 33P is the isotope of choice when labeling probes for in situ hybridizations.

Key concepts: Riboprobe, In situ hybridization, In situ, Biology, Molecular biology, RNA, Molecular probe, Biochemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
33P is preferable to 35S for labeling probes used in in situ hybridization. — Research Paper | ScholarLens