2013bepress Legal RepositoryOpen access

Whittling: Drafting Concise and Effective Appellate Briefs

Brian K. Keller

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

thinking doesn't end at the first detour, but branches out, approaches and appropriates analogous ideas, and grows laterally, much like a tuber, or rhizome.See

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

thinking doesn't end at the first detour, but branches out, approaches and appropriates analogous ideas, and grows laterally, much like a tuber, or rhizome.See

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

thinking doesn't end at the first detour, but branches out, approaches and appropriates analogous ideas, and grows laterally, much like a tuber, or rhizome.See

Key concepts: Law, Supreme court, Law of the case, Craft, Navy, Political science, Argument (complex analysis), Simple (philosophy)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Whittling: Drafting Concise and Effective Appellate Briefs — Research Paper | ScholarLens