1992PubMedRequires access

Which anti-hypertensive to add to a beta-blocker: ACE inhibitor or diuretic?

M Huttunen, Erkki Lampainen, Mauno Lilja, Markku J. Ikäheimo, J Kontro, Pekka J. Mäkynen, Aukusti Savolainen

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Thirty-eight patients already treated with atenolol 50 mg once daily were randomly assigned to treatment with either hydrochlorothiazide (12.5-25 mg once daily) or lisinopril (10-20 mg once daily) for 8 weeks in a double-blind crossover study. Eight weeks' treatment with the combination of ACE inhibitor and beta-blocker or the diuretic and beta-blocker produced falls in blood pressure (lying: -8.4 +/- 15.4/ -7.3 +/- 80 mmHg and -6.1 +/- 15.3/ -5.2 +/- 8.8 mmHg [mean +/- SD] for lisinopril and hydrochlorothiazide respectively; standing: -10.2 +/- 14.2/8.2 +/- 9.2 mmHg and -6.8 +/- 14/ -6.3 +/- 10.3 mmHg for lisinopril and hydrochlorothiazide respectively) which were not statistically significantly different. Heart rate was significantly increased on the combination of beta-blocker and diuretic (lying: +4.3 +/- 10.7; standing: +3.2 +/- 10.0 beats/min) compared with a fall on beta-blocker+ACE inhibitor (lying; -0.5 +/- 7.6; standing: -1.5 +/- 7.4). Both therapeutic regimens were equally well tolerated. These results suggest that where patients fail to respond to monotherapy with a beta-blocker the addition of an ACE inhibitor may be as effective as the more traditional option of diuretic therapy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Thirty-eight patients already treated with atenolol 50 mg once daily were randomly assigned to treatment with either hydrochlorothiazide (12.5-25 mg once daily) or lisinopril (10-20 mg once daily) for 8 weeks in a double-blind crossover study. Eight weeks' treatment with the combination of ACE inhibitor and beta-blocker or the diuretic and beta-blocker produced falls in blood pressure (lying: -8.4 +/- 15.4/ -7.3 +/- 80 mmHg and -6.1 +/- 15.3/ -5.2 +/- 8.8 mmHg [mean +/- SD] for lisinopril and hydrochlorothiazide respectively; standing: -10.2 +/- 14.2/8.2 +/- 9.2 mmHg and -6.8 +/- 14/ -6.3 +/- 10.3 mmHg for lisinopril and hydrochlorothiazide respectively) which were not statistically significantly different. Heart rate was significantly increased on the combination of beta-blocker and diuretic (lying: +4.3 +/- 10.7; standing: +3.2 +/- 10.0 beats/min) compared with a fall on beta-blocker+ACE inhibitor (lying; -0.5 +/- 7.6; standing: -1.5 +/- 7.4). Both therapeutic regimens were equally well tolerated. These results suggest that where patients fail to respond to monotherapy with a beta-blocker the addition of an ACE inhibitor may be as effective as the more traditional option of diuretic therapy.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Thirty-eight patients already treated with atenolol 50 mg once daily were randomly assigned to treatment with either hydrochlorothiazide (12.5-25 mg once daily) or lisinopril (10-20 mg once daily) for 8 weeks in a double-blind crossover study. Eight weeks' treatment with the combination of ACE inhibitor and beta-blocker or the diuretic and beta-blocker produced falls in blood pressure (lying: -8.4 +/- 15.4/ -7.3 +/- 80 mmHg and -6.1 +/- 15.3/ -5.2 +/- 8.8 mmHg [mean +/- SD] for lisinopril and hydrochlorothiazide respectively; standing: -10.2 +/- 14.2/8.2 +/- 9.2 mmHg and -6.8 +/- 14/ -6.3 +/- 10.3 mmHg for lisinopril and hydrochlorothiazide respectively) which were not statistically significantly different. Heart rate was significantly increased on the combination of beta-blocker and diuretic (lying: +4.3 +/- 10.7; standing: +3.2 +/- 10.0 beats/min) compared with a fall on beta-blocker+ACE inhibitor (lying; -0.5 +/- 7.6; standing: -1.5 +/- 7.4). Both therapeutic regimens were equally well tolerated. These results suggest that where patients fail to respond to monotherapy with a beta-blocker the addition of an ACE inhibitor may be as effective as the more traditional option of diuretic therapy.

Key concepts: Lisinopril, Diuretic, Hydrochlorothiazide, Atenolol, Medicine, ACE inhibitor, Beta blocker, Blood pressure

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Which anti-hypertensive to add to a beta-blocker: ACE inhibitor or diuretic? — Research Paper | ScholarLens