2013Unpublished venueRequires access

THE EFFECTS OF COLONIALISM ON SOUTH ASIAN IMMIGRANT LITERATURE: GENDER IN JHUMPHA LAHIRI’S THE INTERPRETER OF MALADIES AND BHARTI MUKHERJEE’S JASMINE

Saif Raza

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This thesis examines two South Asian immigrant narratives, Bharti Mukherjee’s Jasmine and Jhumpa Lahiri’s Interpreter of Maladies, through Abdul R. JanMohamed’s framework for colonial literature. I argue that these works deviate from the traditional understanding of immigrant narratives, due to the colonialism’s impact in South Asia. To prove this, I demonstrate how the South Asian immigrants do not struggle with the criteria William Boelhower delineates in his work “The Immigrant Novel as Genre.” Then I argue that these two texts are examples of symbolic colonial literature as they create hierarchal binaries between the Americans and the South Asians. To demonstrate these binaries, I examine gender roles in the first and second generation of the immigrants. First, I examine differences in masculine performances, arguing that Lahiri and Mukherjee are responding to colonial portrayals of effeminate Indian men. Then, I examine the differences in feminine performances, arguing that South Asian women are portrayed as inferior to American women. After examining gender roles and demonstrating how these two works differ from the traditional immigrant narrative, I conclude that they are examples of symbolic colonial literature.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This thesis examines two South Asian immigrant narratives, Bharti Mukherjee’s Jasmine and Jhumpa Lahiri’s Interpreter of Maladies, through Abdul R. JanMohamed’s framework for colonial literature. I argue that these works deviate from the traditional understanding of immigrant narratives, due to the colonialism’s impact in South Asia. To prove this, I demonstrate how the South Asian immigrants do not struggle with the criteria William Boelhower delineates in his work “The Immigrant Novel as Genre.” Then I argue that these two texts are examples of symbolic colonial literature as they create hierarchal binaries between the Americans and the South Asians. To demonstrate these binaries, I examine gender roles in the first and second generation of the immigrants. First, I examine differences in masculine performances, arguing that Lahiri and Mukherjee are responding to colonial portrayals of effeminate Indian men. Then, I examine the differences in feminine performances, arguing that South Asian women are portrayed as inferior to American women. After examining gender roles and demonstrating how these two works differ from the traditional immigrant narrative, I conclude that they are examples of symbolic colonial literature.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This thesis examines two South Asian immigrant narratives, Bharti Mukherjee’s Jasmine and Jhumpa Lahiri’s Interpreter of Maladies, through Abdul R. JanMohamed’s framework for colonial literature. I argue that these works deviate from the traditional understanding of immigrant narratives, due to the colonialism’s impact in South Asia. To prove this, I demonstrate how the South Asian immigrants do not struggle with the criteria William Boelhower delineates in his work “The Immigrant Novel as Genre.” Then I argue that these two texts are examples of symbolic colonial literature as they create hierarchal binaries between the Americans and the South Asians. To demonstrate these binaries, I examine gender roles in the first and second generation of the immigrants. First, I examine differences in masculine performances, arguing that Lahiri and Mukherjee are responding to colonial portrayals of effeminate Indian men. Then, I examine the differences in feminine performances, arguing that South Asian women are portrayed as inferior to American women. After examining gender roles and demonstrating how these two works differ from the traditional immigrant narrative, I conclude that they are examples of symbolic colonial literature.

Key concepts: Colonialism, Immigration, Narrative, Gender studies, Interpreter, South asia, Sociology, History

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
THE EFFECTS OF COLONIALISM ON SOUTH ASIAN IMMIGRANT LITERATURE: GENDER IN JHUMPHA LAHIRI’S THE INTERPRETER OF MALADIES AND BHARTI MUKHERJEE’S JASMINE — Research Paper | ScholarLens