THE EFFECTS OF COLONIALISM ON SOUTH ASIAN IMMIGRANT LITERATURE: GENDER IN JHUMPHA LAHIRI’S THE INTERPRETER OF MALADIES AND BHARTI MUKHERJEE’S JASMINE
Saif Raza
Abstract
Saif Raza
Abstract
This thesis examines two South Asian immigrant narratives, Bharti Mukherjee’s Jasmine and Jhumpa Lahiri’s Interpreter of Maladies, through Abdul R. JanMohamed’s framework for colonial literature. I argue that these works deviate from the traditional understanding of immigrant narratives, due to the colonialism’s impact in South Asia. To prove this, I demonstrate how the South Asian immigrants do not struggle with the criteria William Boelhower delineates in his work “The Immigrant Novel as Genre.” Then I argue that these two texts are examples of symbolic colonial literature as they create hierarchal binaries between the Americans and the South Asians. To demonstrate these binaries, I examine gender roles in the first and second generation of the immigrants. First, I examine differences in masculine performances, arguing that Lahiri and Mukherjee are responding to colonial portrayals of effeminate Indian men. Then, I examine the differences in feminine performances, arguing that South Asian women are portrayed as inferior to American women. After examining gender roles and demonstrating how these two works differ from the traditional immigrant narrative, I conclude that they are examples of symbolic colonial literature.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This thesis examines two South Asian immigrant narratives, Bharti Mukherjee’s Jasmine and Jhumpa Lahiri’s Interpreter of Maladies, through Abdul R. JanMohamed’s framework for colonial literature. I argue that these works deviate from the traditional understanding of immigrant narratives, due to the colonialism’s impact in South Asia. To prove this, I demonstrate how the South Asian immigrants do not struggle with the criteria William Boelhower delineates in his work “The Immigrant Novel as Genre.” Then I argue that these two texts are examples of symbolic colonial literature as they create hierarchal binaries between the Americans and the South Asians. To demonstrate these binaries, I examine gender roles in the first and second generation of the immigrants. First, I examine differences in masculine performances, arguing that Lahiri and Mukherjee are responding to colonial portrayals of effeminate Indian men. Then, I examine the differences in feminine performances, arguing that South Asian women are portrayed as inferior to American women. After examining gender roles and demonstrating how these two works differ from the traditional immigrant narrative, I conclude that they are examples of symbolic colonial literature.
Key concepts: Colonialism, Immigration, Narrative, Gender studies, Interpreter, South asia, Sociology, History