What is an Honors Student? A Noel-Levitz Survey
Donald P. Kaczvinsky
Abstract
Open-access reader
Donald P. Kaczvinsky
Abstract
Open-access reader
In an impressive article published in the 2005 summer issue of JNCHC,Cheryl Achterberg laments the lack of empirical data available to provide a workable definition for honors students. While she duly notes that there is an “ideology ” that honors students are “superior ” to other students in an insti-tution or of “high ability ” or “the best and brightest, ” she laments that “[t]here are few characteristics of honors students that can be standardized, measured, or uniformly compared across institutions ” (Achterberg 75). She concludes her article with these considerations: honors students are “not a homogeneous group with a set of absolute or fixed characteristics”; they “have much in common with other non-honors students of their own age group”; they “are (or should be) academically superior to their non-honors counterparts within any given institution”; and they “are probably little different today than the honors students of yesteryear. ” Achterberg calls for more research to under-stand “how honors students develop academically, intellectually, socially, emotionally, and as leaders relative to their non-honors peers ” (79). In the same issue of the JNCHC, Rosalie C. Otero finds honors students
OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In an impressive article published in the 2005 summer issue of JNCHC,Cheryl Achterberg laments the lack of empirical data available to provide a workable definition for honors students. While she duly notes that there is an “ideology ” that honors students are “superior ” to other students in an insti-tution or of “high ability ” or “the best and brightest, ” she laments that “[t]here are few characteristics of honors students that can be standardized, measured, or uniformly compared across institutions ” (Achterberg 75). She concludes her article with these considerations: honors students are “not a homogeneous group with a set of absolute or fixed characteristics”; they “have much in common with other non-honors students of their own age group”; they “are (or should be) academically superior to their non-honors counterparts within any given institution”; and they “are probably little different today than the honors students of yesteryear. ” Achterberg calls for more research to under-stand “how honors students develop academically, intellectually, socially, emotionally, and as leaders relative to their non-honors peers ” (79). In the same issue of the JNCHC, Rosalie C. Otero finds honors students
Key concepts: Mathematics education, Institution, Psychology, Sociology, Social science