1999•Unpublished venueRequires access

The Pragmatics of Defining Religion: Contexts, Concepts, and Contests

Jan G. Platvoet, Arie L. Molendijk

Open publisher page 36 citations

Abstract

This volume promotes a pragmatic, anti-essentialist and anti-hegemonic approach to the problem of the definition of religion. It argues that definitions of religion are context-bound strategies for pursuing a variety of purposes, extra-academic as well as academic. Religions being immensely varied, complex and multi-functional phenomena, they need to be studied by several academic disciplines from many different perspectives. It is, therefore, legitimate and useful that many definitions of religion are developed. The volume has contributions from scholars in the philosophy of sociology, the comparative study of religions, anthropology of religion, sociology of religion and psychology of religion. It has chapters on the polemics of defining religion in modern contexts, the history of the concept of religion, and the methodology of its definition; it includes and concludes with several definition proposals.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This volume promotes a pragmatic, anti-essentialist and anti-hegemonic approach to the problem of the definition of religion. It argues that definitions of religion are context-bound strategies for pursuing a variety of purposes, extra-academic as well as academic. Religions being immensely varied, complex and multi-functional phenomena, they need to be studied by several academic disciplines from many different perspectives. It is, therefore, legitimate and useful that many definitions of religion are developed. The volume has contributions from scholars in the philosophy of sociology, the comparative study of religions, anthropology of religion, sociology of religion and psychology of religion. It has chapters on the polemics of defining religion in modern contexts, the history of the concept of religion, and the methodology of its definition; it includes and concludes with several definition proposals.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 36 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This volume promotes a pragmatic, anti-essentialist and anti-hegemonic approach to the problem of the definition of religion. It argues that definitions of religion are context-bound strategies for pursuing a variety of purposes, extra-academic as well as academic. Religions being immensely varied, complex and multi-functional phenomena, they need to be studied by several academic disciplines from many different perspectives. It is, therefore, legitimate and useful that many definitions of religion are developed. The volume has contributions from scholars in the philosophy of sociology, the comparative study of religions, anthropology of religion, sociology of religion and psychology of religion. It has chapters on the polemics of defining religion in modern contexts, the history of the concept of religion, and the methodology of its definition; it includes and concludes with several definition proposals.

Key concepts: Epistemology, Sociology, Essentialism, Variety (cybernetics), Comparative theology, Context (archaeology), Sociology of religion, Hegemony

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Pragmatics of Defining Religion: Contexts, Concepts, and Contests — Research Paper | ScholarLens