Exploring the pros and cons of target date funds
Ben S. Branch, Liping Qiu
Abstract
Open-access reader
Ben S. Branch, Liping Qiu
Abstract
Open-access reader
Herein, we explore the potential performance of both fixed allocation and target date strategies using one, five, IO, 20, and 40 year bootstrapping windows. We find not only that the mean accumulations and annuity values rise with the stock allocation percentage but also that both the Sharpe and Treynor ratios are substantially higher for the high concentration stock portfolios. These results challenge the claims of target date funds. If the past performance of the asset classes is a useful guide, the probability that performance will be worse for a high fixed stock allocation is not only small but any underperformance is likely to be relatively modest.
OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Herein, we explore the potential performance of both fixed allocation and target date strategies using one, five, IO, 20, and 40 year bootstrapping windows. We find not only that the mean accumulations and annuity values rise with the stock allocation percentage but also that both the Sharpe and Treynor ratios are substantially higher for the high concentration stock portfolios. These results challenge the claims of target date funds. If the past performance of the asset classes is a useful guide, the probability that performance will be worse for a high fixed stock allocation is not only small but any underperformance is likely to be relatively modest.
Key concepts: Asset allocation, Sharpe ratio, Stock (firearms), Actuarial science, Passive management, Portfolio, Business, Pension