2013RePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsRequires access

Analyzing Banks' Opinions on the Loan Supply and Loan Demand Using Multi-Country Bank Lending Survey Data

Defne Mutluer Kurul

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In the aftermath of the financial crisis, understanding the lending behavior of banks has become more important than ever. In this context, bank lending surveys, which are regularly conducted by central banks, enable us to disentangle the drivers of loan supply and loan demand. This paper attempts to analyze the information content of lending surveys, by making advantage of the cross-sectional dimension of seventeen comparative country data. Statistical analyses support that in overall, banks tend to report tighter lending standards, whereas they are more neutral in evaluating the loan demand. In addition, an asymmetrical behavior exists for price and non-price conditions where banks applied stricter terms during tightening periods, whereas they opt to loosen their terms and conditions to a lesser extent during easing periods. Another question that this paper tries to answer is about the directional accuracy of qualitative forecasts- in other words, how well the banks� opinions in predicting the future behavior of the loan supply or the loan demand are. Results of the directional analysis, which is performed to assess the usefulness of bank lending surveys, indicate that forecasts are valuable in predicting the change in the loan supply and loan demand, while forecasters� ability differs across periods of increasing and decreasing loan supply and loan demand.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In the aftermath of the financial crisis, understanding the lending behavior of banks has become more important than ever. In this context, bank lending surveys, which are regularly conducted by central banks, enable us to disentangle the drivers of loan supply and loan demand. This paper attempts to analyze the information content of lending surveys, by making advantage of the cross-sectional dimension of seventeen comparative country data. Statistical analyses support that in overall, banks tend to report tighter lending standards, whereas they are more neutral in evaluating the loan demand. In addition, an asymmetrical behavior exists for price and non-price conditions where banks applied stricter terms during tightening periods, whereas they opt to loosen their terms and conditions to a lesser extent during easing periods. Another question that this paper tries to answer is about the directional accuracy of qualitative forecasts- in other words, how well the banks� opinions in predicting the future behavior of the loan supply or the loan demand are. Results of the directional analysis, which is performed to assess the usefulness of bank lending surveys, indicate that forecasts are valuable in predicting the change in the loan supply and loan demand, while forecasters� ability differs across periods of increasing and decreasing loan supply and loan demand.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In the aftermath of the financial crisis, understanding the lending behavior of banks has become more important than ever. In this context, bank lending surveys, which are regularly conducted by central banks, enable us to disentangle the drivers of loan supply and loan demand. This paper attempts to analyze the information content of lending surveys, by making advantage of the cross-sectional dimension of seventeen comparative country data. Statistical analyses support that in overall, banks tend to report tighter lending standards, whereas they are more neutral in evaluating the loan demand. In addition, an asymmetrical behavior exists for price and non-price conditions where banks applied stricter terms during tightening periods, whereas they opt to loosen their terms and conditions to a lesser extent during easing periods. Another question that this paper tries to answer is about the directional accuracy of qualitative forecasts- in other words, how well the banks� opinions in predicting the future behavior of the loan supply or the loan demand are. Results of the directional analysis, which is performed to assess the usefulness of bank lending surveys, indicate that forecasts are valuable in predicting the change in the loan supply and loan demand, while forecasters� ability differs across periods of increasing and decreasing loan supply and loan demand.

Key concepts: Loan, Participation loan, Dimension (graph theory), Cross-collateralization, Business, Context (archaeology), Supply and demand, Non-performing loan

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Analyzing Banks' Opinions on the Loan Supply and Loan Demand Using Multi-Country Bank Lending Survey Data — Research Paper | ScholarLens