2008Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna)Requires access

One market, how many social models? Policy and performance indicators for the EU - 27

Riccardo Rovelli

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

In this paper I reappraise the Boeri-Sapir analysis of four EU social models in reference to the EU-27 countries. I conduct a simple fact-finding exercise by comparing indicators of policy inputs, outcomes and of economic performance for the period 2000-2005.\nThe first three sections elaborate on the motivations for this exercise. Here, I argue that the debate on "social Europe" fits well within the agenda for the internal market.However, I also argue that there is no need to harmonize social policies across member states, and that their differences are a value in itself.\nIn section four I document to what extent labor market policies of the EU members differ from each to other, how can they be synthetically identified and whether or to what extent differences in labor market outcomes are related to policy differences .\nThe main suggestion of this part is that the simplest ways to describe countries is in terms of the overall size of their Labor Market Progreammes elative to GDP. On the basis of this indicator, more "generous" countries generally display high employment rates and appear more successful than others at reducing poverty risk.\nTwo other broad questions motivate this study: whether the new member states of the EU can be meaningfully compared to the older members, and whether the observed changes in social policies point to a possible de facto convergence of the different social models. Tentative answers to both questions are positive (albeit, for the second one, possibly only in the long run).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this paper I reappraise the Boeri-Sapir analysis of four EU social models in reference to the EU-27 countries. I conduct a simple fact-finding exercise by comparing indicators of policy inputs, outcomes and of economic performance for the period 2000-2005.\nThe first three sections elaborate on the motivations for this exercise. Here, I argue that the debate on "social Europe" fits well within the agenda for the internal market.However, I also argue that there is no need to harmonize social policies across member states, and that their differences are a value in itself.\nIn section four I document to what extent labor market policies of the EU members differ from each to other, how can they be synthetically identified and whether or to what extent differences in labor market outcomes are related to policy differences .\nThe main suggestion of this part is that the simplest ways to describe countries is in terms of the overall size of their Labor Market Progreammes elative to GDP. On the basis of this indicator, more "generous" countries generally display high employment rates and appear more successful than others at reducing poverty risk.\nTwo other broad questions motivate this study: whether the new member states of the EU can be meaningfully compared to the older members, and whether the observed changes in social policies point to a possible de facto convergence of the different social models. Tentative answers to both questions are positive (albeit, for the second one, possibly only in the long run).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this paper I reappraise the Boeri-Sapir analysis of four EU social models in reference to the EU-27 countries. I conduct a simple fact-finding exercise by comparing indicators of policy inputs, outcomes and of economic performance for the period 2000-2005.\nThe first three sections elaborate on the motivations for this exercise. Here, I argue that the debate on "social Europe" fits well within the agenda for the internal market.However, I also argue that there is no need to harmonize social policies across member states, and that their differences are a value in itself.\nIn section four I document to what extent labor market policies of the EU members differ from each to other, how can they be synthetically identified and whether or to what extent differences in labor market outcomes are related to policy differences .\nThe main suggestion of this part is that the simplest ways to describe countries is in terms of the overall size of their Labor Market Progreammes elative to GDP. On the basis of this indicator, more "generous" countries generally display high employment rates and appear more successful than others at reducing poverty risk.\nTwo other broad questions motivate this study: whether the new member states of the EU can be meaningfully compared to the older members, and whether the observed changes in social policies point to a possible de facto convergence of the different social models. Tentative answers to both questions are positive (albeit, for the second one, possibly only in the long run).

Key concepts: Business, Industrial organization

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
One market, how many social models? Policy and performance indicators for the EU - 27 — Research Paper | ScholarLens