Duplication of the renal pelvis and ureter: associated anomalies and pathological conditions.
Kazuo Inamoto, Stacy T. Tanaka, Kotaro Takemura, F Ikoma
Abstract
Kazuo Inamoto, Stacy T. Tanaka, Kotaro Takemura, F Ikoma
Abstract
Thirty-one patients with anomalous and/or pathological conditions in the duplication of the renal pelvis and ureter were studied in order to analyze the urographic findings. A segmental defect evident in the visualization was caused by the abscess of one of the poles in the kidney. In patients with hypoplasia of one of the poles, the other normal pelvis extended to the neighboring segment, and consequently showed the same pattern as a simple pelvis and ureter on urography. The renal hypoplasia was apt to be combined with simple or ectopic ureterocele and ectopic ureteral opening. In patients with non-visualization of two pelves, hydronephrosis or renal hypoplasia was proved by other radiological modalities including computed tomography. Incidence of vesicoureteral reflux was more frequent in the ureter of the lower pelvis. Reflux was also found between the two ureters of the bifid ureter. It was concluded that these urographical findings correlated closely with pathological conditions.
OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Thirty-one patients with anomalous and/or pathological conditions in the duplication of the renal pelvis and ureter were studied in order to analyze the urographic findings. A segmental defect evident in the visualization was caused by the abscess of one of the poles in the kidney. In patients with hypoplasia of one of the poles, the other normal pelvis extended to the neighboring segment, and consequently showed the same pattern as a simple pelvis and ureter on urography. The renal hypoplasia was apt to be combined with simple or ectopic ureterocele and ectopic ureteral opening. In patients with non-visualization of two pelves, hydronephrosis or renal hypoplasia was proved by other radiological modalities including computed tomography. Incidence of vesicoureteral reflux was more frequent in the ureter of the lower pelvis. Reflux was also found between the two ureters of the bifid ureter. It was concluded that these urographical findings correlated closely with pathological conditions.
Key concepts: Ureter, Medicine, Renal pelvis, Hydronephrosis, Ectopic ureter, Vesicoureteral reflux, Hypoplasia, Ureterocele