1978Cambridge University Press eBooksRequires access

Labour and Industrialization in Russia

Olga Crisp

Open publisher page 51 citations

Abstract

Introduction By ‘industrialization’, for the purpose of this study, is understood a process of change in time at the centre of which is a switch from manufacture of commodities by hand to that using machinery and mechanical motive power. It marks the rise of ‘modern industry’, absorbing increasing proportions of fixed capital relative to circulating capital. Its corollary is the factory system, entailing the problems of recruiting, training, and managing a spatially concentrated labour force and of apportioning resources between various factors of production in accordance with the nature of the individual enterprise and its ultimate aim of maximizing profit. In the long run, and at a pace and in patterns differing with individual economies, industrialization releases processes of change in the nature of society, in the composition of the labour force, in the structure of the GNP, and in incomes per head. In Russia ‘modern industry’ of any significance dates from the 1830s, when it was confined by and large to the cotton-spinning and beet-sugar industries. By 1861, a date conventionally regarded as the watershed separating modern from traditional Russia, about 85 per cent of sugar and about 90 per cent of cotton yarn was produced in factories by mechanical means. In these two industries there was undoubtedly continuity across the watershed of the Emancipation of serfs in 1861. Other industries, however, were only marginally affected by the new methods of manufacture: cotton-weaving remained at the handicraft stage, and mining, metallurgy, and metal-processing in particular remained backward and traditional.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Introduction By ‘industrialization’, for the purpose of this study, is understood a process of change in time at the centre of which is a switch from manufacture of commodities by hand to that using machinery and mechanical motive power. It marks the rise of ‘modern industry’, absorbing increasing proportions of fixed capital relative to circulating capital. Its corollary is the factory system, entailing the problems of recruiting, training, and managing a spatially concentrated labour force and of apportioning resources between various factors of production in accordance with the nature of the individual enterprise and its ultimate aim of maximizing profit. In the long run, and at a pace and in patterns differing with individual economies, industrialization releases processes of change in the nature of society, in the composition of the labour force, in the structure of the GNP, and in incomes per head. In Russia ‘modern industry’ of any significance dates from the 1830s, when it was confined by and large to the cotton-spinning and beet-sugar industries. By 1861, a date conventionally regarded as the watershed separating modern from traditional Russia, about 85 per cent of sugar and about 90 per cent of cotton yarn was produced in factories by mechanical means. In these two industries there was undoubtedly continuity across the watershed of the Emancipation of serfs in 1861. Other industries, however, were only marginally affected by the new methods of manufacture: cotton-weaving remained at the handicraft stage, and mining, metallurgy, and metal-processing in particular remained backward and traditional.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 51 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Introduction By ‘industrialization’, for the purpose of this study, is understood a process of change in time at the centre of which is a switch from manufacture of commodities by hand to that using machinery and mechanical motive power. It marks the rise of ‘modern industry’, absorbing increasing proportions of fixed capital relative to circulating capital. Its corollary is the factory system, entailing the problems of recruiting, training, and managing a spatially concentrated labour force and of apportioning resources between various factors of production in accordance with the nature of the individual enterprise and its ultimate aim of maximizing profit. In the long run, and at a pace and in patterns differing with individual economies, industrialization releases processes of change in the nature of society, in the composition of the labour force, in the structure of the GNP, and in incomes per head. In Russia ‘modern industry’ of any significance dates from the 1830s, when it was confined by and large to the cotton-spinning and beet-sugar industries. By 1861, a date conventionally regarded as the watershed separating modern from traditional Russia, about 85 per cent of sugar and about 90 per cent of cotton yarn was produced in factories by mechanical means. In these two industries there was undoubtedly continuity across the watershed of the Emancipation of serfs in 1861. Other industries, however, were only marginally affected by the new methods of manufacture: cotton-weaving remained at the handicraft stage, and mining, metallurgy, and metal-processing in particular remained backward and traditional.

Key concepts: Industrialisation, Economics, Market economy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Labour and Industrialization in Russia — Research Paper | ScholarLens