2009•Unpublished venueRequires access

Chapter 28. Interlocutory Appeals In The Early Practice Of The International Criminal Court

Håkan Friman

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

The right of appeal is now generally acknowledged as a fundamental human right in criminal proceedings, at least as far as the convicted persons appeal against the conviction or sentence is concerned. Moreover, a right of appeal that is afforded to both the accused and the prosecutor exists in many domestic systems as well as in the international criminal courts (ICC) and tribunals. By prohibiting interlocutory appeals one will avoid the delays normally caused by appeal proceedings. Indeed, some would argue that interlocutory appeals are generally disfavoured and that the scope should be restricted to an absolute minimum, perhaps only to challenges to the courts jurisdiction, construed in a narrow sense. The statutory regime means that the Pre-Trial Chamber, or Trial Chamber, is designated as the gatekeeper to the Appeals Chamber concerning all decisions with respect to which leave to appeal is required. Keywords: Appeals Chamber; interlocutory appeals; international criminal courts (ICC); Pre-Trial Chamber

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The right of appeal is now generally acknowledged as a fundamental human right in criminal proceedings, at least as far as the convicted persons appeal against the conviction or sentence is concerned. Moreover, a right of appeal that is afforded to both the accused and the prosecutor exists in many domestic systems as well as in the international criminal courts (ICC) and tribunals. By prohibiting interlocutory appeals one will avoid the delays normally caused by appeal proceedings. Indeed, some would argue that interlocutory appeals are generally disfavoured and that the scope should be restricted to an absolute minimum, perhaps only to challenges to the courts jurisdiction, construed in a narrow sense. The statutory regime means that the Pre-Trial Chamber, or Trial Chamber, is designated as the gatekeeper to the Appeals Chamber concerning all decisions with respect to which leave to appeal is required. Keywords: Appeals Chamber; interlocutory appeals; international criminal courts (ICC); Pre-Trial Chamber

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The right of appeal is now generally acknowledged as a fundamental human right in criminal proceedings, at least as far as the convicted persons appeal against the conviction or sentence is concerned. Moreover, a right of appeal that is afforded to both the accused and the prosecutor exists in many domestic systems as well as in the international criminal courts (ICC) and tribunals. By prohibiting interlocutory appeals one will avoid the delays normally caused by appeal proceedings. Indeed, some would argue that interlocutory appeals are generally disfavoured and that the scope should be restricted to an absolute minimum, perhaps only to challenges to the courts jurisdiction, construed in a narrow sense. The statutory regime means that the Pre-Trial Chamber, or Trial Chamber, is designated as the gatekeeper to the Appeals Chamber concerning all decisions with respect to which leave to appeal is required. Keywords: Appeals Chamber; interlocutory appeals; international criminal courts (ICC); Pre-Trial Chamber

Key concepts: Interlocutory, Law, Political science, Criminology, Psychology, Appeal

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Chapter 28. Interlocutory Appeals In The Early Practice Of The International Criminal Court — Research Paper | ScholarLens