1998•Netherlands Quarterly of Human RightsRequires access

The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the Jurisprudence of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights

Yutaka Arai

Open publisher page 13 citations

Abstract

The margin of appreciation is a measure of discretion allowed to the Member States in the manner that they implement the standards of the European Convention on Human Rights, taking into account their national particular circumstances. Both the European Commission and Court of Human Rights are entrusted with the balancing between the Europe-wide ‘uniform’ approach on one hand and the need to defer to the national sovereignty and to various local values deriving from cultural, religious, and socioeconomic diversity on the other. By analysing the interplay between strictness of scrutiny and the width of the margin of appreciation in the case-law of Article 8, the author attempts to identify the underlying policy grounds for the margin of appreciation under Article 8. He argues that there are certain policies which affect the judicial self-restraint and those which uphold the active review in the jurisprudence of Article 8.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The margin of appreciation is a measure of discretion allowed to the Member States in the manner that they implement the standards of the European Convention on Human Rights, taking into account their national particular circumstances. Both the European Commission and Court of Human Rights are entrusted with the balancing between the Europe-wide ‘uniform’ approach on one hand and the need to defer to the national sovereignty and to various local values deriving from cultural, religious, and socioeconomic diversity on the other. By analysing the interplay between strictness of scrutiny and the width of the margin of appreciation in the case-law of Article 8, the author attempts to identify the underlying policy grounds for the margin of appreciation under Article 8. He argues that there are certain policies which affect the judicial self-restraint and those which uphold the active review in the jurisprudence of Article 8.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The margin of appreciation is a measure of discretion allowed to the Member States in the manner that they implement the standards of the European Convention on Human Rights, taking into account their national particular circumstances. Both the European Commission and Court of Human Rights are entrusted with the balancing between the Europe-wide ‘uniform’ approach on one hand and the need to defer to the national sovereignty and to various local values deriving from cultural, religious, and socioeconomic diversity on the other. By analysing the interplay between strictness of scrutiny and the width of the margin of appreciation in the case-law of Article 8, the author attempts to identify the underlying policy grounds for the margin of appreciation under Article 8. He argues that there are certain policies which affect the judicial self-restraint and those which uphold the active review in the jurisprudence of Article 8.

Key concepts: Margin of appreciation, Jurisprudence, Human rights, Scrutiny, Political science, Law, Discretion, Convention

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the Jurisprudence of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights — Research Paper | ScholarLens