2013•Journal of Physical Activity and HealthRequires access

Construct Validation of the Greek Version of the Children’s Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment (CAPE) and Preferences for Activities of Children (PAC)

Irini Anastasiadi, George C. Tzetzis

Open publisher page 17 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Children's Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment (CAPE) and the Preferences for Activities of Children (PAC) are 2 measures of children's participation in various activities. The purpose of this study was the validation of the Greek version of "CAPE & PAC." METHODS: The questionnaires were translated and pilot tested on a sample of 25 individuals. The reliability and validity of the questionnaires were tested on 302 individuals (253 typical population, 49 disabled), 6-21 years of age. The construct validity of the instruments was examined the directional hypothesis by comparing known groups with existing differences. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted to determine the validity of the typology of activities. The reliability was examined by checking the internal consistency of the instruments. RESULTS: The comparison between divergent groups confirmed the predicted differences of the mean scores and the validity of the instruments. Seven factors (categories of activities) emerged from the factor analysis. The acceptable range of Cronbach alpha for the PAC scale indicated high consistency. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that partially support the validity and reliability of "CAPE & PAC" instruments to use in Greek population. Further investigation is recommended for both clinical and research purposes.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: The Children's Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment (CAPE) and the Preferences for Activities of Children (PAC) are 2 measures of children's participation in various activities. The purpose of this study was the validation of the Greek version of "CAPE & PAC." METHODS: The questionnaires were translated and pilot tested on a sample of 25 individuals. The reliability and validity of the questionnaires were tested on 302 individuals (253 typical population, 49 disabled), 6-21 years of age. The construct validity of the instruments was examined the directional hypothesis by comparing known groups with existing differences. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted to determine the validity of the typology of activities. The reliability was examined by checking the internal consistency of the instruments. RESULTS: The comparison between divergent groups confirmed the predicted differences of the mean scores and the validity of the instruments. Seven factors (categories of activities) emerged from the factor analysis. The acceptable range of Cronbach alpha for the PAC scale indicated high consistency. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that partially support the validity and reliability of "CAPE & PAC" instruments to use in Greek population. Further investigation is recommended for both clinical and research purposes.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 17 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: The Children's Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment (CAPE) and the Preferences for Activities of Children (PAC) are 2 measures of children's participation in various activities. The purpose of this study was the validation of the Greek version of "CAPE & PAC." METHODS: The questionnaires were translated and pilot tested on a sample of 25 individuals. The reliability and validity of the questionnaires were tested on 302 individuals (253 typical population, 49 disabled), 6-21 years of age. The construct validity of the instruments was examined the directional hypothesis by comparing known groups with existing differences. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted to determine the validity of the typology of activities. The reliability was examined by checking the internal consistency of the instruments. RESULTS: The comparison between divergent groups confirmed the predicted differences of the mean scores and the validity of the instruments. Seven factors (categories of activities) emerged from the factor analysis. The acceptable range of Cronbach alpha for the PAC scale indicated high consistency. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that partially support the validity and reliability of "CAPE & PAC" instruments to use in Greek population. Further investigation is recommended for both clinical and research purposes.

Key concepts: Cronbach's alpha, Construct validity, Psychology, Exploratory factor analysis, Reliability (semiconductor), Scale (ratio), Typology, Population

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Construct Validation of the Greek Version of the Children’s Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment (CAPE) and Preferences for Activities of Children (PAC) — Research Paper | ScholarLens