2010•Pepperdine Digital Commons (Pepperdine University)Open access

The Supreme Court's Take on Immigration in Nken v. Holder: Reaffirming a Traditional Standard that Affords Courts More Time and Flexibility to Decide Immigration Appeals before Deporting Aliens

Elizaveta Kabanova

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

For fiscal year 2008, some 60,108 individuals were admitted into the United States as refugees and 22,930 people were admitted as asylees.Id.Fiscal years last between October I and September 30 of the following year.Id.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

For fiscal year 2008, some 60,108 individuals were admitted into the United States as refugees and 22,930 people were admitted as asylees.Id.Fiscal years last between October I and September 30 of the following year.Id.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

For fiscal year 2008, some 60,108 individuals were admitted into the United States as refugees and 22,930 people were admitted as asylees.Id.Fiscal years last between October I and September 30 of the following year.Id.

Key concepts: Flexibility (engineering), Immigration, Supreme court, Law, Immigration law, Political science, Immigration reform, Economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Supreme Court's Take on Immigration in Nken v. Holder: Reaffirming a Traditional Standard that Affords Courts More Time and Flexibility to Decide Immigration Appeals before Deporting Aliens — Research Paper | ScholarLens