‘Responsibilty to Protect’ and ‘Functional Sovereignty’
Hans‐Georg Dederer
Abstract
Hans‐Georg Dederer
Abstract
The concept of 'responsibility to protect' (R2P) is based on a specific conception of sovereignty, that is, of 'sovereignty as responsibility'. R2P is invariably linked to a particular understanding of State sovereignty. This chapter verbalizes this core idea of State sovereignty by using the notion of 'functional sovereignty'. Accordingly, basing R2P on the broader concept of 'functional sovereignty' enables one to broaden the current scope of R2P beyond the sphere of conscience-shocking violations of human rights and humanitarian norms to other forms of contempt of the 'international volonte generale'. At the heart of the conceptual evolution of R2P lies the conflict between State sovereignty on the one side and international solidarity with a State's desperately suffering population on the other side. Linking the concept of R2P to the concept of 'functional' sovereignty means that R2P does not only have a humanitarian dimension but also, an environmental or cultural dimension. Keywords: cultural heritage; environmental degradation; functional sovereignty; humanitarian norms; international human rights; responsibility to protect (R2P); state sovereignty
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The concept of 'responsibility to protect' (R2P) is based on a specific conception of sovereignty, that is, of 'sovereignty as responsibility'. R2P is invariably linked to a particular understanding of State sovereignty. This chapter verbalizes this core idea of State sovereignty by using the notion of 'functional sovereignty'. Accordingly, basing R2P on the broader concept of 'functional sovereignty' enables one to broaden the current scope of R2P beyond the sphere of conscience-shocking violations of human rights and humanitarian norms to other forms of contempt of the 'international volonte generale'. At the heart of the conceptual evolution of R2P lies the conflict between State sovereignty on the one side and international solidarity with a State's desperately suffering population on the other side. Linking the concept of R2P to the concept of 'functional' sovereignty means that R2P does not only have a humanitarian dimension but also, an environmental or cultural dimension. Keywords: cultural heritage; environmental degradation; functional sovereignty; humanitarian norms; international human rights; responsibility to protect (R2P); state sovereignty
Key concepts: Sovereignty, Responsibility to protect, Political science, Human rights, State (computer science), Law and economics, Population, International law