WASH-1400: insights utilized in assessing alternate containment designs. [PWR]
D.D. Carlson, J.W. Hickman, Taylor
Abstract
D.D. Carlson, J.W. Hickman, Taylor
Abstract
The Reactor Safety Study (WASH-1400) identified two characteristics important for comparing the relative value and impact of alternate containment designs. First, that the public risk from nuclear reactor accidents stems principally from Class 9 or core-meltdown accidents, and second, that the nature of the containment failure in the core-meltdown accident is a major factor in determining the resultant public consequences. These two characteristics were used to identify a set of containment design alternatives which appear to provide the greatest potential for reducing public risk at the most reasonable cost.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The Reactor Safety Study (WASH-1400) identified two characteristics important for comparing the relative value and impact of alternate containment designs. First, that the public risk from nuclear reactor accidents stems principally from Class 9 or core-meltdown accidents, and second, that the nature of the containment failure in the core-meltdown accident is a major factor in determining the resultant public consequences. These two characteristics were used to identify a set of containment design alternatives which appear to provide the greatest potential for reducing public risk at the most reasonable cost.
Key concepts: Containment (computer programming), Core (optical fiber), Risk analysis (engineering), Engineering, Forensic engineering, Environmental science, Waste management, Computer science