Quantum-classical correspondence in two simple systems
Bradley Clarke Hughes
Abstract
Open-access reader
Bradley Clarke Hughes
Abstract
Open-access reader
In this thesis, a comparison between quantum and classical mechanics was made for two systems whose classical behaviour can be chaotic.The general correspondence between classical mechanics and quantum mechanics in the classical regime has always been assumed but never proved.Recent research in the field of quantum chaos has brought this assumption into question.For some systems, such as the kicked rotor in the classically chaotic regime, quantum mechanics does not display the classical behaviour of unbounded momentum.It has been suggested that quantum mechanics will fail to produce classical chaos for a broad range of simple systems.A comparison of quantum and classical mechanics was made using numerical simulations, without recourse to taking limits such as 7i going to zero.The two systems studied were a driven pendulum and a pair of pendula joined by a spring.The quantum and classical expectation values for a number of observables were computed, as were the probability distributions in phase space.For periodic motion of the driven pendulum it was found that the theories agreed well for times up to 150 driving periods.Similar agreement was found for initial conditions whose classical behaviour was chaotic, but only for times up to a few tens of driving periods.For longer times, it was found that the quantum system displayed a boundedness in position and/or momentum that was absent in the classical system.A possible explanation was given in terms of the quasienergy expansion.In the coupled-pendula system no such disagreements between the theories were found.I would like to thank Dr. Ballentine for his continued support during this project and his help in editing and revising this thesis.I would like to thank the members of my committee, Drs.Bechhoefer, Boa1 and Loss for their many suggestions.For many helpful discussions, I would like to thank Dominic Mimnagh and Jim Zibin.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In this thesis, a comparison between quantum and classical mechanics was made for two systems whose classical behaviour can be chaotic.The general correspondence between classical mechanics and quantum mechanics in the classical regime has always been assumed but never proved.Recent research in the field of quantum chaos has brought this assumption into question.For some systems, such as the kicked rotor in the classically chaotic regime, quantum mechanics does not display the classical behaviour of unbounded momentum.It has been suggested that quantum mechanics will fail to produce classical chaos for a broad range of simple systems.A comparison of quantum and classical mechanics was made using numerical simulations, without recourse to taking limits such as 7i going to zero.The two systems studied were a driven pendulum and a pair of pendula joined by a spring.The quantum and classical expectation values for a number of observables were computed, as were the probability distributions in phase space.For periodic motion of the driven pendulum it was found that the theories agreed well for times up to 150 driving periods.Similar agreement was found for initial conditions whose classical behaviour was chaotic, but only for times up to a few tens of driving periods.For longer times, it was found that the quantum system displayed a boundedness in position and/or momentum that was absent in the classical system.A possible explanation was given in terms of the quasienergy expansion.In the coupled-pendula system no such disagreements between the theories were found.I would like to thank Dr. Ballentine for his continued support during this project and his help in editing and revising this thesis.I would like to thank the members of my committee, Drs.Bechhoefer, Boa1 and Loss for their many suggestions.For many helpful discussions, I would like to thank Dominic Mimnagh and Jim Zibin.
Key concepts: Quantum chaos, Classical limit, Classical mechanics, Method of quantum characteristics, Physics, Observable, Quantum dissipation, Classical physics