2015arXiv (Cornell University)Open access

A Refutation of the Clique-Based P=NP Proofs of LaPlante and Tamta-Pande-Dhami

Hector A. Cardenas, Chester Holtz, Maria Janczak, Philip R. Meyers, Nathaniel S. Potrepka

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

In this work, we critique two papers, "A Polynomial-Time Solution to the Clique Problem" by Tamta, Pande, and Dhami, and "A Polynomial-Time Algorithm For Solving Clique Problems" by LaPlante. We summarize and analyze both papers, noting that the algorithms presented in both papers are flawed. We conclude that neither author has successfully established that P = NP.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this work, we critique two papers, "A Polynomial-Time Solution to the Clique Problem" by Tamta, Pande, and Dhami, and "A Polynomial-Time Algorithm For Solving Clique Problems" by LaPlante. We summarize and analyze both papers, noting that the algorithms presented in both papers are flawed. We conclude that neither author has successfully established that P = NP.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this work, we critique two papers, "A Polynomial-Time Solution to the Clique Problem" by Tamta, Pande, and Dhami, and "A Polynomial-Time Algorithm For Solving Clique Problems" by LaPlante. We summarize and analyze both papers, noting that the algorithms presented in both papers are flawed. We conclude that neither author has successfully established that P = NP.

Key concepts: Clique, Mathematical proof, Clique problem, Polynomial, Mathematics, Time complexity, P versus NP problem, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Refutation of the Clique-Based P=NP Proofs of LaPlante and Tamta-Pande-Dhami — Research Paper | ScholarLens