A Refutation of the Clique-Based P=NP Proofs of LaPlante and Tamta-Pande-Dhami
Hector A. Cardenas, Chester Holtz, Maria Janczak, Philip R. Meyers, Nathaniel S. Potrepka
Abstract
Open-access reader
Hector A. Cardenas, Chester Holtz, Maria Janczak, Philip R. Meyers, Nathaniel S. Potrepka
Abstract
Open-access reader
In this work, we critique two papers, "A Polynomial-Time Solution to the Clique Problem" by Tamta, Pande, and Dhami, and "A Polynomial-Time Algorithm For Solving Clique Problems" by LaPlante. We summarize and analyze both papers, noting that the algorithms presented in both papers are flawed. We conclude that neither author has successfully established that P = NP.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In this work, we critique two papers, "A Polynomial-Time Solution to the Clique Problem" by Tamta, Pande, and Dhami, and "A Polynomial-Time Algorithm For Solving Clique Problems" by LaPlante. We summarize and analyze both papers, noting that the algorithms presented in both papers are flawed. We conclude that neither author has successfully established that P = NP.
Key concepts: Clique, Mathematical proof, Clique problem, Polynomial, Mathematics, Time complexity, P versus NP problem, Computer science