2002bepress Legal RepositoryOpen access

Expanded Rights through State Law: The United States Supreme Court Shows State Courts the Way

Robert L. Brown

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

Three important cases decided during 2002 show the Arkansas Supreme Court embracing the new judicial federalism with a commitment and panache not previously seen in Arkansas jurisprudence.In one four-month stretch, the court used the search-and-seizure provision of the Arkansas constitution as the basis for affirming the suppression of items seized during an illegal night-time search,' affirmed the constitutional invalidity of a pretextual arrest and the * Associate Justice, Arkansas Supreme Court.I am indebted to my law clerk for the 2001-2002 term, Erin Vinett, who not only did extensive research and analysis for this article but also worked closely with me on the seminal cases that gave rise to it.Additional research, which proved invaluable, was done by one of my 2002-2003 law clerks, Christian Harris, while a second 2002-2003 law clerk, Michael Mosley, offered constructive comments.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Three important cases decided during 2002 show the Arkansas Supreme Court embracing the new judicial federalism with a commitment and panache not previously seen in Arkansas jurisprudence.In one four-month stretch, the court used the search-and-seizure provision of the Arkansas constitution as the basis for affirming the suppression of items seized during an illegal night-time search,' affirmed the constitutional invalidity of a pretextual arrest and the * Associate Justice, Arkansas Supreme Court.I am indebted to my law clerk for the 2001-2002 term, Erin Vinett, who not only did extensive research and analysis for this article but also worked closely with me on the seminal cases that gave rise to it.Additional research, which proved invaluable, was done by one of my 2002-2003 law clerks, Christian Harris, while a second 2002-2003 law clerk, Michael Mosley, offered constructive comments.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Three important cases decided during 2002 show the Arkansas Supreme Court embracing the new judicial federalism with a commitment and panache not previously seen in Arkansas jurisprudence.In one four-month stretch, the court used the search-and-seizure provision of the Arkansas constitution as the basis for affirming the suppression of items seized during an illegal night-time search,' affirmed the constitutional invalidity of a pretextual arrest and the * Associate Justice, Arkansas Supreme Court.I am indebted to my law clerk for the 2001-2002 term, Erin Vinett, who not only did extensive research and analysis for this article but also worked closely with me on the seminal cases that gave rise to it.Additional research, which proved invaluable, was done by one of my 2002-2003 law clerks, Christian Harris, while a second 2002-2003 law clerk, Michael Mosley, offered constructive comments.

Key concepts: Supreme court, Law, Constitution, Statute, Political science, Search and seizure, Jurisprudence, Original jurisdiction

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Expanded Rights through State Law: The United States Supreme Court Shows State Courts the Way — Research Paper | ScholarLens