Road pricing lessons - : the experience to date
M Buchanan
Abstract
M Buchanan
Abstract
When in 2005 the government announced the Transport Innovation Fund (TIF), it took sometime before it became clear that innovation meant road pricing and had little to do with innovative public transport systems. Two years later, as the government finds itself confronted with massive bills for investments in the tram systems judged to be necessary prerequisites for the introduction of a bewildering range of road pricing schemes in the conurbations, it is timely to review world-wide experience of road pricing to date and to attempt to identify the characteristics of a good road user charging scheme and the conditions necessary for successful implementation.
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
When in 2005 the government announced the Transport Innovation Fund (TIF), it took sometime before it became clear that innovation meant road pricing and had little to do with innovative public transport systems. Two years later, as the government finds itself confronted with massive bills for investments in the tram systems judged to be necessary prerequisites for the introduction of a bewildering range of road pricing schemes in the conurbations, it is timely to review world-wide experience of road pricing to date and to attempt to identify the characteristics of a good road user charging scheme and the conditions necessary for successful implementation.
Key concepts: Road pricing, Singapore Area Licensing Scheme, Public transport, Transport engineering, Government (linguistics), Business, Bus priority, Road traffic